Talk:Augustus M. Kelley

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Creation

I created this page because just a brief amount of searching will show that A) this is a significant publisher who merits a Wikipedia entry but that B) on line resources demonstrating the publisher's history are not easy to interpret. By having this Wikipedia entry, there is a chance that editor's better informed will be able to put some more flesh on these bones. Why have I done this? Because I keep finding books in my library from this publisher. I wanted to know more and it was not easy to find a quick bio.Robertforsythe (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

The article contained a number of references. Someone has deleted them but left the numbers in. The article did all make sense prior to 30th July 2013. Now it does not.Robertforsythe (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Issue in interpretation

This entry was initially compiled using two available sources. A Wikipedia search and an Open Library entry. It is however likely that the latter is misleading. When individual early book covers are brought up a different publisher is shown on the flyleaf. The logic suggests that this publisher came into prominence in the 1960s largely as a reprint publisher. Own imprint first editions go back to at least 1956.
NOTE^^Not my edit; I moved this from the main article.Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 05:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]