Talk:De mirabilibus sacrae scripturae

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Literature / Science / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of science
	Medieval philosophy

Wrong Date

The Catholic Encyclopedia puts the timeframe at the 9th century, About 847 he appeared in France at the court of Charles the Bald. Not the date of 655A.D. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05519a.htm Celtic Harper 17:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slight confusion, that's John Scotus Erigena that they are referring to, and we do indeed have him living in the 9th century. Probably it should be mentioned that this Eriugena is rather better known as Augustinus Hibernicus. There's a paper from Chronicon which deals with him here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Just reporting here that this article was previously at Augustine Eriugena, but seeing as this is a rare name at best, I took the liberty to move it to something more appropriate. Both "Augustinus Hibernicus" and "the Irish Augustine" are commonly attested (Pseudo-Augustine may be another, but potentially ambiguous variant). I thought "Irish Augustine" would look slightly odd without definite article, but if it appears to be a gratuitous addition in violation of WP guidelines, then feel free to move the article to "Irish Augustine". Cavila (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, forget all that. In hindsight I'd say that we only need to have an article for his claim to fame, De mirabilibus sacrae scripturae, and some redirects from the author's name : ) Cavila (talk) 12:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]