Talk:Augustina Gabel

Augustina Gabel is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by GnocchiFan (talk) at 17:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Ukraine

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Augustina Gabel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: GnocchiFan (talk · contribs) 17:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 15:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This looks an interesting article on a topic in a generally underrepresented field. I will start my review against the Good Article criteria shortly. simongraham (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GnocchiFan: Before I progress, please confirm that this article has been expanded "with text translated from the corresponding article in Ukrainian" as requested. simongraham (talk) 04:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to do so, yes. If there is anything in particular missing, please let me know. Thanks. GnocchiFan (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work. Thank you. I will begin my assessment now. simongraham (talk) 12:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Overall, the standard of the article is high.
It is relatively small, with 864 words of readable prose.
The lead is also short long at 86 words.
Authorship is 98.2% from the nominator with contributions from 8 other editors including bots.
It is currently assessed as a B class article.
Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text for accessibility.

Criteria

The six good article criteria:

It is reasonable well written.
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- The writing is clear and appropriate.
- Reword "alongside with"
it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
- Please expand the lead. As per {{MOS:LEAD]], "it should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies." I feel there is more that can be said to help the casual reader.
- There are many redlinks. Suggest "police supervision" wikilinks to Surveillance. Is the article Kapitan (rank) appropriate for "Titular Councillor"? Is her prison listed in Prisons in Russia?
- Suggest using cite templates rather than citation as this will give the parameters for journals etc.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- A reference section is included, with sources listed.
- Please add trans to the non_english titles.
- Nikipelova 2011 and Gabel 1932 lack a publisher.
all inline citations are from reliable sources;
- The majority of sources are non-English and offline so AGF.
- Spot checks confirm Mamon 2020.
- Is the citation for Gabel 1932 correct? The link seems to be to the second volume of a series.
it contains no original research;
- All relevant statements have inline citations.
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
- Earwig gives a 1% chance of copyright violation, which means it is extremely unlikely.
It is broad in its coverage
it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- Please remove the Expand Ukrainian tag.
- Please expand "was elected its member". For example, was she a member representing a particular cohort over a particular time?
- The mention of her Catholicism is very brief and without context. Can anything more be said? Did her faith influence her actions? For example, id it influence her desire to join the Herzegovina uprising? Did she connect with Catholics of similar views?
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- The article generally compliant, but lacks detail on any controversies. For example, is there any information on her anarchistic activity in exile?
It has a neutral point of view.
it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- The article seems generally balanced.
It is stable.
it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- There is no evidence of edit wars.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
- The images have appropriate PD tags.
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
- The images are appropriate, showing her at different ages.

@GnocchiFan: Thank you for an interesting article. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GnocchiFan:, reminder ping! simongraham (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]