Jump to content

Talk:Augusta Raurica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Augusta Raurica/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cynwolfe (talk · contribs) 17:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I regret that I must preemptively fail this per WP:GACR: An article can be failed without further review if, prior to the review, it has cleanup banners that are obviously still valid. The article has only one footnote, to the Swiss Inventory of Cultural Property of National and Regional Significance. The 1995 edition is cited, though more recent editions exist. All the other sources listed are in German; I don't question their reliability, but the section is called "Further reading" and I don't know whether they were actually used to compile the article. Published English RS exist and should be incorporated, so that the information is more readily verifiable by the users of the English encyclopedia. The writing is clear, but without citations I have no way of checking whether it's a straightforward translation and therefore possibly a copyright violation. The article is well-illustrated (though I didn't check licensing). I would encourage editors who would like to see this brought to GA status mainly to add footnotes and a variety of English-language sources to supplement the German, including published research.

Thanks! I certainly expected some of this feedback. They are all very good starting points to improve the article.--Codrin.B (talk) 07:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Augusta Raurica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]