Talk:August Strindberg's Little Catechism for the Underclass

Stub article

Hello @Praxidicae

You have removed around 95 % of the article. I would like to discuss what you think I could change to make sure the article lives up to your demands. You apparently read and decided that my sources did not add anything in less than one minute. So to come up with some changes which we can implement together should not be very hard. If you would like to help out.

Kind regards, Pauloroboto Pauloroboto (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I've already explained to you twice, as did SPECIFICO, all content must be a summary of waht independent reliable sources say - not your personal essays or thoughts - none of the sources remotely touch on the content you included. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're able to claim that with confidence, then you have most likely not read the sources.

Can you please take a look at them and write something a bit more concrete here when you have done so? (I don't mean to be rude, I just can not believe that you read them right now.) Pauloroboto (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to analyse every source for you. That's on you. Please read WP:NOTESSAY and WP:42. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it sounds very reasonable that you're going to dispute something you have not really read?

However I am not going to put more time into this right now. But thanks for your input.

I'll also just note that whoever wishes to expand the article, or read a version with some content can start here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=August_Strindberg%27s_Little_Catechism_for_the_Underclass&oldid=1093297580 Pauloroboto (talk) 09:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]