Talk:August 15th (2008 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

China: Cinema Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed move

(Per WP:NCF) I'd recommend that the title of this article be August 15th (Film) not August 15th (Sundance Short Film) as it is now . I'm sure that this film will have a life beyond the Sundance Film Festival, and the article name should reflect this. —A 00:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest August 15th (2008 film) (with a lowercase "f" for "film") so that the reader does not confuse it with with the article on the 2001 French film (currently located at 15 August (film), which should be renamed to 15 August (2001 film) or 15 August (French film)). Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 02:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, it should be with a lowercase f, as that is what the naming convention is. I'll consider it a typo and ask that everyone else do the same :). So does anyone object to a move to August 15th (2008 film) and a move of 15 August (film) to 15 August (2001 film) with a disambig page at 15 August (film)? —A 06:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since it has been over a week and no one has commented on this, I'll assume that everyone is okay with it and go ahead with the page move myself. I have also moved 15 August (film) to 15 August (2001 film) as per the as per the proposed move on it's talk page. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 15:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on August 15th (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080625173633/http://sundance.org/festival/press_industry/releases/pdf/2008-01-26-Awards.pdf to http://sundance.org/festival/press_industry/releases/pdf/2008-01-26-Awards.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]