Talk:Augmented second

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Augmented second article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Music theory Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diatonic interval?

As the article stands, a reader would come away from it with the assurance that the augmented second is a diatonic interval. (Read, checking for occurrences of the word diatonic.) Is this a good idea? In a couple of senses the interval is diatonic, but in other senses it is not (see Diatonic and chromatic). Perhaps this needs some work.

– Noetica^♬♩ Talk 04:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong image?

I think the image is an augmented unison, not an augmented second. This is confusing.

Requested audio

I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]