Jump to content

Talk:Audrey Pauley/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 02:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

[edit]

General

[edit]
  • No dab links. Great work!
  • No dead links. Great work!
  • Non-free images have good rationales.

Infobox

[edit]
  • Infobox Television episode should be "Infobox television episode" (extremely picky)
  • Per MOS:PUNCT, "Consistent use of the straight (or typewriter) apostrophe ( ' ) is recommended, as opposed to the curly (or typographic) apostrophe ( ’ )." That being said, I see that Barreiro’s and Barreiro’s Daughter use that when they should use '

Lede

[edit]

Plot

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Broadcast and reception

[edit]
  • "Audrey Pauley" originally aired on the Fox network in the United States on March 17, 2002 and in the United Kingdom on BBC One on January 26, 2003.[3] During its initial broadcast, the entry was viewed by 5.1 million households[nb 1] and ranked as the 68th most watched episode of television that aired during the week ending March 17.[8] It received a Nielsen household rating of 4.8, meaning that it was seen by 4.8% of the nation's estimated households" re-write to: ""Audrey Pauley" originally aired on the Fox network on March 17, 2002, and was first broadcast in the United Kingdom on BBC One on January 26, 2003.[3] The episode's initial broadcast was viewed by approximately 5.1 million households[nb 1], making it the the sixty-eighth most watched episode of television that aired during the week ending on March 17.[8] "Audrey Pauley" earned a Nielsen household rating of 4.8, meaning that roughly 4.8 percent of all television-equipped households, were tuned in to the episode.
  • Anyway you can add Nielsen share
  • "The episode received mostly positive reviews from television critics" should be "The episode has generally received positive reviews from television critics."

Notes

[edit]
  • Nothing

References

[edit]
[edit]
  • Nothing

On hold. Great work! TBrandley 07:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've got them all.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I'll pass. Congrats! TBrandley 17:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]