Talk:Audiophile Records

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Here's the text from the box:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. 1) It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since May 2011. 2) It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications. Tagged since May 2011. 3) It may contain original research or unverifiable claims. Tagged since May 2011.

This is great. Thanks for the check up. I do want to try to make this right.

1) The two sources cited (reprints of which are available on the linked page) do include the information in the text. Perhaps more frequent insertions of the reference numbers may make this more clear. There is considerable (but not complete) overlap in those two aricles.

2) The two referenced articles do include virtually all of the information in the text. I will remove the one thing I can think of that was not in there (i.e., about the RCA vinyl, actually, I'll modify that).

3) I don't believe that this text includes original research or unverifiable claims but if you could point them out to me, I'd be happy to deal with them.

Also, I went to the Record Label Task Force page and it wasn't really clear what could be done there. I had put the link to the labels on the Audiophile Records page as well as the link to Audiophile Records on the record label page.

I mostly did this (and added to another page) because I am interested in 50s era hifi record labels (oddly collectable these days) and they are very poorly represented on Wikipedia.

Richard Beckwith RichardBeckwith (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The external link was no longer active. I replaced it with a link to a web archive that is active.

Robert Gilchrist Huenemann 07 January 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.14.121.161 (talk) 08:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

combination of two different companies called Audiophile?

The quote at the top of the page seems to be for company that bought the rights to the music recorded by Ewing at Audiophile Records. It's not clear to me that this Jazzology label is even primarily about Audiophile Records. I don't think it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardBeckwith (talk • contribs) 00:01, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]