Talk:Auckland International College

This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand schools, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.New Zealand schoolsWikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand schoolsTemplate:WikiProject New Zealand schoolsNew Zealand schools articles

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: Not much here and no references. Adam McCormick 23:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edits Mr Bluefin 00:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Edits have been made to make the article sound neutral and to remove the pro-AIC tone of this article.

In particular:

IB Diploma. It is true that its not common in NZ (let alone anywhere else). But specifics on the IB can be found on the IB page. After all you don't say on an individual school page that A2s are taken after ASes; that stuff does not belong.
This page is to explain the school, and not the IBD. Information on who can do what, if not already explained on the IB page, is not encyclopaedic, since its a bit like describing a canteen list etc. CAS, Extended Essay, subject groups etc are all on the IB page.
Details on Pre-IB kept since its different for each school.
Don't take other school pages as a model. The larger NZ school pages tend to be poorly written and full of unnecessary detail.
Data reduncancy: Links to TKI and the school are already summarised in the infobox, so it doesn;t need to be repeated. Just a reminder, the point of the infobox is to present raw data in a way that does not need to be interpreted for the reader, and if it presents the school in a not-so-rosy light, then so be it. After all, notable schools will already have been regarded as such and its no Le Rosey.
Other IB school pages do not encumber themselves with details of the IB.
Wikipedia is not a soapbox. It is absolutley not a school prospectus.

Mr Bluefin 00:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Omission of Business in Group 3: While it is a fact, it is not encyclopaedic. Its like saying there are n number of buildings on campus --- it is a fact but not directly relevant to the understanding of the institution. As I said above, this is not a school prospectus.

This is not to say I have anything against the school. Actually I'm quite impressed that in less than 5 years the school has an impressive overseas university admit record :D Mr Bluefin 11:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although I agree with most of what you said, I do not think there was a pro-AIC tone in the article. There was a description of the school's curriculum. It might have gone into more depth than necessary (eg. the IBD details) but certainly its purpose was not to promote the school. I saw the links now. Thank you :) By the way, I have a question (cuz I am quite new here) how do I know when you respond to this message? I already clicked on "watch this page" but I am not sure how that would help. Would there be a reminder or I have to remind myself to check this talk page? Cheers, --Le Ha Giang 12:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, it was probably a mistake on my part then. I'm not a perfect editor :D Resposnes to messages: Everyone has their own different way of responding to messages. I responded on my own talk page but some respond on the other's talk page. I decided to put it on my own page without a pointer on your talk page because your talk page was a clean sheet and thought it was like that for some reason unknown to me (usually I alert the other person some way or another on their talk page). So yeah, pretty much the only way you know is to watch the talk pages. BTW, when someone leaves a message on your talk, an orange box appears next time you load a page from Wikipedia. Cheers Mr Bluefin 02:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further edits have been made to make the information added by an anonymous IP more suitable. For a start while it is true that AIC has a strong overseas university admit record (as I noted on this page above), this article is NOT the place to put the information. Overseas admit records is 100% prospectus-type information.

The entire criticism section has been cut because of the massive amount of weasling going on---no names, no sources to back up assertions, etc (see the weasling link for why such information should not be on WP). Any information on this topic needs to be sourced, e.g. newspaper. Paragraphs written by the students should be taken with a grain of salt since they obviously have a bias (even if they do not themselves feel one)---a bias of being a student.

"According to a former student of AIC…": This is NOT the place for original reporting. In the absence of an external news source, this information has been deleted.

"Critics argue…" is a classic case of weasling, which is frowned upon. This has been deleted.

However if there are citable news articles on the "unsociable nature" of AIC or AIC's strictness wrt curriculum then by all means add it.

Anyone planning to add information to this article in the future should note that no original research is allowed on Wikipedia and must strictly keep to external sources. Further it is recommended that if you are a student at the school, that you refrain from editing this article.

Mr Bluefin 09:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Aic school logo.gif

I found Image:Aic school logo.gif and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aic school logo.gif

Image:Aic school logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History not really needed.

Taking it out.--SoLongWith (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]