Talk:Aubrey Koch
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aubrey Koch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Aubrey Koch has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Credits
[edit]Thanks to editors Graeme Bartlett, John of Reading and Ian Rose for the constructive help and advice.Lexysexy (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
British RAF Officer
[edit]I reverted the amendment to the above of the short description because it is potentially misleading. Does the "British" refer to "RAF" or to "RAF Officer"? The fact is that Koch was an Australian RAF Officer. Further, Koch' relationship with the RAF was for four years, a minuscule proportion of his life. I think that "Pioneer military and civilian pilot" is a better short description, however I don't want to start an edit war.Lexysexy (talk) 00:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Aubrey Koch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 16:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. Of eighteen on board. Suggest - Of the eighteen people on board
- amended to this, and the following phrase changed for simplicity
2. broke the right leg. Suggest - broke his right leg
- agreed and done
3. and 13 out of the 31 on board. Suggest - and 13 out of the 31 people on board
- agreed and done
4. Australian Government determined. Suggest - Australian Government was determined
- I'd prefer to leave this alone. The meaning is that a determination was made (later reversed by the High Court) rather than simply that the Government had an inclination to do something, see Trans Australia Airlines.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Passed. Good job. Thurgate (talk) 10:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class aerospace biography articles
- Aerospace biography task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles