Talk:Atyrau Region

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Atyrau Region is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atyrau Region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://atyrau.gov.kz/ru/apparat-akima-zhylyojskogo-rajona-1/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120607170705/http://www.atyrau.gov.kz/ to http://atyrau.gov.kz
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120607170705/http://www.atyrau.gov.kz/ to http://atyrau.gov.kz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this absurdity

Please, somebody, stop this absurdity. The Arabic language / alphabet has never been used in this region, and is not used today. Stop adding here the name of the city in the Arabic scrypt.

It is unlikely that you get a response if you start discussions at individual talk pages. If you want to get a responce, it must be an RFC, see WP:RfC, and I would suggest Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style as a more appropriate location. However, please make sure you have read the policies before starting the RfC (WP:MOSGEO to start with). So far, your arguments were not policy-based, and people usually do not like when their time is wasted.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter Lol, I was banned from editing the article, and given a few warnings, unlike you. You just thoughtlessly correct my edits, and use your administrator status, all other moderators, although they admitted that they do not understand this at all, have come to your side. You claim without evidence and facts that the Arabic scrypt is used in this country (absolutely all the inhabitants of this country will tell you that this is complete nonsense), therefore, it’s not for you to talk about evidence. What evidence do you need? That such a scrypt is not used? This is nonsense, how should it look? You must provide evidence that this alphabet is used, not me. I have no desire to participate in this delusional discussion, in which other moderators will definitely take your side. Instead, I want you to search the Internet about the Arabic alphabet in Kazakhstan. It has not been used for more than 500 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackAtkinson22 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have an essay about your behavior, WP:ICANTHEARYOU. You have been explained by multiple users that what you allege is factually wrong and/or irrelevant, but you continue to allege it. May be you should stop talking nonsense and listen once to what reasonable people tell you.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter I am surprised how strange all the same people have administrator status. They said, "I'm not an expert on this." Now, I literally quoted them, now you justify your words. Who wrote that I'm wrong? If you again start to avoid my questions, then the conversation is over. Have you answered at least one of my questions? Why did you decide that the Arabic scripts is used in Kazakhstan. Give evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackAtkinson22 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter. Do we have reliable sources for Arabic as an official language? Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 21:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Roxy, it doesn't need one; this is an article about a Kazakh topic, and as such we always give the spelling in the Latin, Cyrillic and Arabic alphabets. (For complicated reasons owing to various partitions of the area, the same language uses the three different scripts depending on whether the speaker is in Kazakhstan, China or Mongolia; it's explained at Kazakh language.) ‑ Iridescent 21:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Has anybody explained this to jack? Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 21:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. ‑ Iridescent 21:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source, so Kazakh language doesn’t cut the mustard. At iridescents yes link, there is no consensus. Hmmm. Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 21:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My message was initially that since the Arabic script names have been in the articles for ages, and since there are at least some plausible arguments to keep them, mass removal with edit-warring is not really an appropriate course of action. After an ANI discussion and warnings by multiple users, the user finally stopped removing the names and started this discussion. As a response (my first message in this very topic) I said that the discussion is more general than about this particular page, and suggested an appropruate page, but a day later, we are still there.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]