Talk:Attorney general

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crimea/USSR

These two entries seem out of place, all other entries in the second list refer to existing countries (at the "federal level").

Austalian Attorney General

Today it was announced under the new government would be Robert McLelland. Should this be changed?

Attorneys General

How about a section explaining why the plural is Attorneys General and not Attorney Generals. [1] [2] Ewlyahoocom 16:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because Attorney General is Postpositive. The noun is attorney. "General" is an adjective. -- 67.42.107.14 (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Isle of Man fall under the UK heading in the list?

No, the Isle of Man is a Crown Dependency but not part of the United Kingdom. NRPanikker 01:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subpoena power

Why is there no mention of the Attorney General's subpoena power?

I would have thought this is his main tool for conducting or initiating criminal investigations. No?91.149.13.201 21:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

I think the title should be "Attorney general". The "a" and "g" are, depending on context, capitalised when referring to a specific office (e.g., Attorney General of Australia), but not when referring generally to attorneys general. For example, "Three attorneys general filed a brief with the court." As a result, the first sentence of the lead should say, "In most common law jurisdictions, the attorney general, or attorney-general, is the main legal advisor to the government..." -Rrius (talk) 01:34, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. Mooretwin (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added this page to WP:Requested moves. -Rrius (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support move. The article is about the offices (common noun) not the title (proper noun). --Bejnar (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I am exceptional. Shah Alam samol (talk) 12:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page should have an image on it.

Egyptian State Lawsuits Authority

I removed the reference to this as the section makes clear its more similar to the common law system's solicitor general than an attorney general. Plus it already has its own article and the section here merely restated the entirity of that article. - Chrism would like to hear from you 18:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He or She

What is the relevance of the parenthetical "(he or she)" at the end of the first sentence in the Usage section? The sentence itself is already gender-neutral, and it's entirely unclear who this "(he or she)" is meant to refer to -- is it stating that the attorney general could be a he or a she? ... that the principal could be a he or a she? Either way it seems to me to be entirely pointless, as neither attorney nor principal have some sort of masculine/feminine word dichotomy: there is no "attornette general" or a "principelle" if you take my meaning. 72.218.100.143 (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ToC query

Is there a particular reason why the ToC is limited to 2 levels? If it was to 3 levels, a list of the countries would be included - I was looking up for a particular country, and wondered why I had to scroll down until I found it! We don't need 4 levels (which would merely add the subdivisions of the UK to the ToC) - the 3 levels would be enough. ~~If I have not heard otherwise within a couple of days, I will change it to {{TOClimit}}, which would give level 3 headings.~~ PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 18:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reason is obvious. The list is very long and creates large amount of white space. Whether the third level should appear on the ToC is open to debate, but perhaps we should look to another option. Perhaps we could divide the countries into groups. Countries could be sorted by continent, alphabetically (i.e., "A–K", "L–P"), or by some substantive consideration.

The full list of countries would take up space out of proportion to its importance to the article, but I do agree that some access to the country blurbs from the top would be better than the mere link to "Countries". -Rrius (talk) 20:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duh... I can be really stupid at times! The reason is obvious - however, I think that some quicker access method does need to be considered - although which of your excellent options should be chosen is beyond me, and I will leave that to the wise minds here. PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 20:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

French

Should the link to the french version not be to this page? http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procureur_general —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restraining (talk • contribs) 03:07, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Federal-government of-the United States.jpg Deleted

An image used in this article, File:Federal-government of-the United States.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Adrignola for the following reason: Mass deletion of copyright violations added by Shabany

What should I do?

You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 23:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Netherlands

I added a text about the attorney-general in The Netherlands. If I am correct, the role of the attorney-general at the Supreme Court is similar to the attorney-general at the European Court of Justice, and - if I am not mistaken - this construct came from a French tradition (like so many things in the Dutch legal system). Perhaps someone familiar with French law can provide a further clarification.

If I am correct, attorneys-general in other jurisdictions represent the government as a party in procedures. In The Netherlands, this role is fulfilled by commercial attorneys ("landsadvocaat") that also potentially serve other clients. Rbakels (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need help Shah Alam samol (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

mexico

Separating common law from civil law jurisdictions

I have separated out the common law jurisdictions from the civil law jurisdictions. As the comment above and existing content about Italy demonstrates, even though many civil law countries try to use "attorney general" as the English translation of local titles, because of the different historical provenance the offices are often quite different. Whatever the name, the common law "attorney general" is a different creature to similar civil law offices. Separating those out into a separate section avoids all the confusion about whether or to what extent an Italian or German official is similar to an English attorney-general or American attorney general. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.73.197 (talk) 10:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Attorney general. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Attorney general. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110527150629/http://www.matangitonga.to/article/tonganews/law/2009020609_cauchi_attorneygen_tong.shtml to http://www.matangitonga.to/article/tonganews/law/2009020609_cauchi_attorneygen_tong.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need help for my husband sponsorship

Hello dear sir/Madam hope you are doing well. Sorry for bothering. I am friba Ahmadzai newcomer in Canada. I need your help regarding my husband, mother and my brother sponsorship application. Do you have any program to support me in this way. They are in very bad situation in Afghanistan. I searched a lot but I couldn't find any organization to help me.

Looking forward to hear from you. 207.189.212.226 (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]