Talk:Attock Khurd

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by The person who loves reading, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 7 April 2023.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Cleaning

I cleaned the page and added the required, proved and available content and citations.John Gell (talk) 10:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Attock Khurd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name

I found the discussion of the meaning of the name very illuminating but perhaps over-long for the lede, although this is where these discussions normally go.

I was inclined to break it into a separate section or to make this discussion into a note, but instead I will leave this as constructive criticism for some other editor with more local/topic knowledge.

Perhaps the lede will expand when the article expands and it won't seem so undue. I am not proposing, and would oppose, deleting this material. Elinruby (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Light ce

Given my profound ignorance of the history, I hesitated to delve into this too far, but there seems to have been much that happened here that could be expanded. Meanwhile, I have confined myself to one language correction, removal of some overlinking, and some minor idiom tweaks. English cares a lot about word order, and where I, a motivated North American reader, had to re-read, I have adjusted it. In particular the original editor seems to have had a fondness for a profusion of subordinate clauses between the subject and the verb. I am leaving the copy-edit flag up because it seems possible that it could benefit from an edit for content. I would encourage anyone interested to expand the history, spinning off a separate article if needed. Elinruby (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]