Talk:Attention restoration theory
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article preaches!
[edit]There are a few sentences that are quite valid for a tutorial book on the market, but inappropriate for an encyclopedia:
- Nature has an abundance of fascinating objects.
should be rewritten to something teleological like animals need of regulating attention is due to external dangers and internal needs, if such a clause can be concluded from the source texts,
- Nature can help reduce a person's stress, as well as improve attention.
should be something like the biological factory constituting an animal provides means for increasing attention; these are just suggestions on the direction on how to transform the formulations from religious overtones of salvation to some evolutionary teleological reason. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 09:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Mental Fatigue
[edit]I am adding a considerable amount of new information to this section, with citations and link this section to other articles within Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by DominicAbril (talk • contribs) 15:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- C-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- C-Class psychiatry articles
- Mid-importance psychiatry articles
- Psychiatry task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class neuroscience articles
- Low-importance neuroscience articles