Talk:Attack on German Flatts (1778)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 01:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy these articles and wish to review this one. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"He recruited a mix of Iroquois and white Loyalists estimated " - aren't Loyalists by definition not Indian. I'm not clear what "white" clarifies. Removed Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"He began his campaigning in late May" - began his campaign? Rephrased (especially since the "late May" bit was somewhat repetitive). Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, all is well. MathewTownsend (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for reviewing, glad you enjoy them (there are more in this thread on the way). Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources:

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed:

B. Remains focused:
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: