Jump to content

Talk:Attack of Mark's Clone/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 20:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The following day, Twayne Boneraper has hired a new assistant, Tad, to do his dirty work." Change to "The following day, Twayne Boneraper hires a new assistant named Tad to do his dirty work."
    "Executive producer Daniel Powell said that Clone Mark "glove slaps everyone, smoking a cigarette instead of putting it out before the office"." Reworking into: "Executive producer Daniel Powell said that Clone Mark "glove slaps everyone [and smokes] a cigarette instead of putting it out before the office"."
    "The episode went down the previous episode..." Change to "The episode marked a ratings decrease from the previous episode..."
    "Charles Webb of MTV was favored it over season one episodes, which had "its emphasis on generating a gag a minute within a paper-thin plot"." Change to "Charles Webb of MTV favored it over season one episodes, which emphasized "generating a gag a minute within a paper-thin plot"."
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

On Hold for seven days to straighten out issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I just did the small corrections myself. All fixed! Pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]