This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles
Because ISO is an international standard, we need to include the ISO spelling in the lead. We can discuss what's wrong with it further down. And BTW you can apply to ISO to have the spelling changed. Once a year they go over pending requests and adjust the standard. — kwami (talk) 05:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How is the spelling a "mistake"? If it's a typo by SIL, we should state that, but otherwise lots of spellings in English do not match the orthography of the language, and they don't count as mistakes. — kwami (talk) 06:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]