Jump to content

Talk:Atommash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote: "ZAO Energomash–Atommash (Russian: ЗАО «Энергомаш–Атоммаш») is an engineering company located in Volgodonsk, Rostov Oblast, Russia. Established in 1973 as Atommash..." I'm sorry but this is not correct. ZAO Energomash-Atommash merely assumed management over the assets of Atommash which was forcibly bankrupted. Therefore it's incorrect to state that it was established in 1973. The company was established in 1997 and never owned the assets of Atommash OJSC, which, since 1999, are owned by UK Energomash Ltd (registered in the UK). Please consider rolling back the change. The article is not about the managing company, but about Atommash as a manufacturer instead. Thanks.

Dust of the world (talk) 12:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the company locates at the same location and uses the same premises, it is the same plant, even if it legally not succrssor. The company website talks about the Soviet time and also the article in Russian wiki icludes both: the Soviet time Atommash and nowadays Energomash-Atommash. Also, please provide source for UK Energomash Ltd. Beagel (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The plant is located at the same place and uses the same premises. I would say it is unreasonable to have two articles.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it's unreasonable to have two articles - I just wanted to say the new "ZAO" is not worth an article at all. My point was: the correct name for the plant is Atommash, regardless of who controls it.

Sources for UK Energomash Ltd (only available in Russian):

--Dust of the world (talk) 18:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Atommash is much better recognizable.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After studying these links I understand what you want to say. After bankruptcy of Atommash, based on its assets a new company was created which is called now Energomash-Atommash and which is subsidiary of ZAO Energomash. Who owns Energomash is irrelevant in this context. I fully agree that Atommash is much better recognizable, and therefore the title of this article should be Atommash. However, it should include also its recent history as the manufacturing entity (plant) is the same although they are different legal entities. Beagel (talk) 20:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What if we reapply the structure of the article in Russian? I.e.: the initial paragraph speaks of Atommash (not the ZAO) + I create an additional, comprehensive subsection of the "History" section (right after "Bankruptcy of 1995-1999") that speaks of the plant's recent history (2000-2012), of which plentiful info is available? See Атоммаш#Современность for reference. Regards. Dust of the world (talk) 11:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

rollback of 21.05.2015 - even EIR is not an international agency, it's not appropriate to simply delete the entire text block. Perhaps we can just rephrase the first line? What is EIR by your definition? Dust of the world (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Atommash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Atommash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atommash&oldid=1244368233"