Talk:Atomic tourism

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article format and inclusion criteria

Hello, I noticed that you added Nuclear Waste Adventure Trail, Weldon Spring, Missouri to the Atomic Tourism article. I'm reaching out to let you know that I removed it because the article is formatted such that all sites listed have their own Wikipedia article, and there is not an article for the NWAT. So it is not consistent with the rest of the page. You could start a new article on the NWAT if you are interested in doing so. All best, the Netherzone (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

@Netherzone: I don't think that is a good reason for non-inclusion. I could link it to Weldon Spring Ordnance Works but I did not since it was not explicitly about the visitor area. Other instances in this list also link to related, but not directly, pages. Would that be better?

@DancerEE: Respectfully, whether or not you think it is a "good reason" or a bad reason is irrelevant. The Wikipedia Manual of Style has an entry on the formatting of embedded lists that states: "listed items should be formatted consistently." ALL of the items in the lists embedded in this article begin with a bullet point and a blue-linked site that has its own wikipedia page. Either the Nuclear Waste Adventure Trail is not notable enough to warrant its own WP article, or no one has yet written an article on it. Either way, adding it to the list disrupts the format and style and is inconsistent with the rest of the article. See: [1] As to creating a link to Weldon Spring Ordnance Works that is definitely not a good idea, because the WSOW is not an Atomic Tourist site, but rather a SuperFund site of a former explosives plant, and this article is on Atomic Tourism. You ask "what would be better?" my suggestion is that NWAT is not included in this article until a page is created for it. It is a trail, and seems to be a minor site in relation to other more established museums and atomic legacy facilities. Also, a friendly reminder to please sign your posts with four tildes so your username and time stamp appear on talk page posts, and you can indent your reply by adding colons before you start typing your note. Netherzone (talk) 02:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This site was largely taken from www.atomictourist.com. I am pretty sure it does not violate copyrights, but others might differ.

Should probably also include Chernobyl. 80.221.2.154 21:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per the tag left 12/25/07 I believe this article fulfills "significant" and "notable" per the guildlines. rkmlai (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fukushima

Please stop adding a paragraph on Fukushima. I appreciate the enthusiasm but this article is not a list of civilian nuclear accidents. It does however contain a list of tourist destinations related to nuclear energy, some of which are accident sites.

Fukushima doesn't belong here because the site is still closed and hasn't seen a single tourist. If, one day, the site becomes accessible and attracts tourists (like Chernobyl), it can be mentioned. In the meantime, there are plenty of other opportunities to improve this article.Bomazi (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic accidents section

I added references concerning Chernobyl, whose status as a tourist destination is well established. Are Three Mile Island and Windscale tourist targets as well? How famous is Windscale anyway? I don't know but references and elaborations would be nice. Bomazi (talk) 01:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Literary and cinematic works on atomic tourism

The article is incorrect in asserting that the novel "Roadside Picnic" has anything to do with Chernobyl, considering that the book was written in 1971, and the Chernobyl accident happened in 1986. However, there are computer games, "S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl", "S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky", and "S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat" which have some terminology inspired by the book and are associated with Chernobyl and Pripyat.^[1]35.9.60.184 (talk) 06:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, changed that. Netherzone (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:_Shadow_of_Chernobyl

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atomic tourism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atomic tourism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140825072342/http://www.hackgreen.co.uk/index.htm to http://www.hackgreen.co.uk/index.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lonelyplanet.com/travelblogs/419/40930/Bleak-o%2BTourism%E2%80%A6%2BWelcome%2Bto%2BChernobyl?destId=360912

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links - guidelines for inclusion?

Do we have a guideline for inclusion of external links? Currently there are two that link to personal blogs, My Radioactive Vacation, and Taylor's Nuke Site. While there are some nice photos on these sites, they are personal research, and I'm not sure if they belong here. Feedback requested. Netherzone (talk) 13:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:_Shadow_of_Chernobyl

[1]