Talk:Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space

Europe: ESA Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by ESA task force.

Spaceflight: Space stations Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the space stations working group.

How does this 36month experiment relate to other clocks? Is it anticipated this will set any records?

Also I wonder how this project relates to gravity probe b in terms of general relativity measurements.

"fountain" clock?

Atomic fountain clocks derive their name from the fact that they launch the caesium atoms upwards in a parabolic arc, interrogating them once when they go up and once when they get back down. In microgravity, this concept is meaningless, so it makes no sense to apply this term to the atomic-clock component of the device. Moreover, the project paper (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2015.05.002) draws that distinction several times, describing PHARAO as separate from fountain clocks.

I'm removing that reference until a suitable argument for retaining it is brought up. Episanty (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]