Talk:Atlas bear/Archive 1

Archive 1

Species?

Is the Atlas Bear a true species? I think that it was only a North-African subspecies of Brown Bear, and its scientific name may be Ursus arctos crowtheri.--Menah the Great 00:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

I also heard it, and even rumours that this was not [a] valid race at all. Jurek

It was a separate breeding population, with no contact with other groups (except for human interference). There are two tendencies in biological classification: 'Lumpers', which tend to decrease the number of species and 'Splitters', which tend to increase the number of species. These trends have come and gone over the years and for much of the 19th Century the Splitters were predominate. Bears in particular suffered from this, with sometimes it seems that every new specimen was considered a new species (dinosaurs and other fossils were another group that suffered this; so did wolves). I've got one book that indicates that Modern thought is that the Atlas bear was not a separate species, but a subspecies of European Brown Bear; but species have been established with far less reasons. I do not know if there are sufficient remains left to do a DNA analysis to settle this. CFLeon 01:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Most reliable sources that I have seen suggest that the Atlas Bear was a subspecies of the Brown Bear. However many subspecies have their own articles (Barbary stag, Siberian Tiger, Asiatic Lion, etc). I suppose if the subspecies is distinct enough or notable enough, it warrants its own page. Anyone got any sources? Elostirion (talk) 04:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

On another note I have changed "Tetuan Mountains" to "Rif Mountains", as the Tetuan Mountains do not exist. Tetouan is a city in the Rif range. Elostirion (talk) 04:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Sahara desert

"Nonetheless, as the known distribution of the Atlas bear is a relict of the desertification of the Sahara"

No, the bear never occured there. I plan to edit this out.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raggz (talk • contribs)

Cantabrian Brown Bear

What's the significance of this statement being in the lede? As it seems to be speaking of a different population/species of bear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowd149 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure, perhaps to mention another distinct brown bear population in the region? I would think it would need to be clarified, otherwise readers might assume these two populations are related.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

I agree it's odd, especially when the two sources are publications that discuss the uniqueness of the mitochondrial DNA found in Atlas bears, which suggests that at least the female lines all derived from the lost Atlas subpopulation. I could only read the abstract online without paying, so the publication might have speculated about the possible translocation of male bears by Romans, but if so, I would think they would have cited their source (which I'd guess were historical or anthropological rather than from DNA) and this wiki article should cite THAT source.Paddling bear (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Polar bears in Spain

Is there anywhere available for these purported cave paintings of polar bears in Andalusia? I've removed the bit about it being a short swim for Poplar bears to North Africa as this is just original research claim in this context.2001:8F8:1F22:D10F:2:3:DB33:DA6A (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Colinoneill1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)