Talk:Atiqur Rehman

This article is non-notable and must be deleted.

In accordance with the stipulated criteria for notability on Wikipedia, an assertion may be advanced positing the categorization of the article on Atiqur Rehman as WP:N on the grounds of the ensuing rationales:

1. Insufficiency of Significant Coverage: The article's contents are deficient in engendering a sense of substantial coverage requisite for notability. While it cursorily acknowledges Atiqur Rehman's political affiliation and duration in the Legislative Assembly, the discourse remains superficial, lacking a nuanced examination of his specific contributions, policy influence, or consequential actions during his incumbency. Wikipedia's notability imperative transcends mere acknowledgment, necessitating a comprehensive exegesis that cogently addresses the focal subject.

2. Qualitative Imprecision of Sources: The determinant of notability is profoundly influenced by the quality of sourced materials. The existing information is contingent upon sources beset by an inadequacy of editorial integrity or an insufficiency in quality. Moreover, the sources exhibit a predisposition toward generality and lack specificity, thereby diminishing their efficacy in substantiating claims of notability.

3. Presumed Notability vis-à-vis Veritable Notability: The guidelines proffer the notion that presumed notability ought to be construed as a conjecture rather than an assured proposition. Delving into a more profound deliberation could potentially unveil the contention that the subject matter in question may not warrant an autonomous article should it transgress the tenets delineated by Wikipedia. Principally, if the available content falls short of meeting the requisites for significant coverage, a discerning scrutiny may culminate in the deduction that a stand-alone article is unwarranted. Such scrutiny, indicative of a more discerning and critical examination, becomes imperative to ascertain the veritable substance and eligibility of the subject for standalone representation within the encyclopedic domain.

So Wikipedia Editors,

In the pursuit of encyclopedic excellence, let us collectively uplift the standards of our platform. Embrace the spirit of discernment and veracity. I implore you to scrutinize the article in question, weighing its substantive value against our commitment to notability. With a united effort, let us uphold the integrity of Wikipedia by removing superfluous entries that dilute the essence of our shared knowledge repository. Together, we shape the narrative of information, ensuring only the truly notable find a place in our collective intellectual tapestry. Your decisive action will fortify the credibility of our endeavor and affirm our dedication to quality.

As a poem:

Coverage thin,

mention slight,

Sources weak,

not in light.

Presumed note,

a fading rhyme,

Stand-alone,

unwarranted chime. Alexandria Bucephalous (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)