Talk:Athlinks
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I feel that site merits inclusion based on this in wp:web:
The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
* This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites,
I have a references that are featured on two newspaper's websites.. RockyMountainNews, and an AP National article that is on Foxnews.com website. The RockyMountainNews entry is from one of the writer's blogs..
I realize that the article falls a little short in doing nothing more than describing what it offers (and not what it achieved).. My argument is based on the references.
Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Stub-Class cycling articles
- Unknown-importance cycling articles
- Stub-Class Mountain Biking articles
- Low-importance Mountain Biking articles
- Stub-Class Running articles
- Low-importance Running articles
- WikiProject Running articles
- Stub-Class Triathlon articles
- Stub-Class Athletics articles
- Unknown-importance Athletics articles
- WikiProject Athletics articles