Talk:Athletics at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification

Athletics Mid‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Accuracy

At this point in time, more than 12 months before the end of the qualification period, I have got to question the naming of qualified athletes into the Olympics. This is beyond speculative WP:CHRYSTAL. What we get from the IAAF is lists of athletic performances. The qualification period is barely 2 months old. Correctly United States athletes are not named, but looking at the women's 400 metres, there are already 29 qualified athletes. Only 3 of them will go to the Olympics and that will not be decided for almost a full year in an entirely different athletics season. An entire new cast of characters is likely by that time. There are no automatic qualifiers for the Olympics.

The IAAF lists and our reporting is not accurate. In the women's 200 metres they have listed Virgin Ilands Flora Hyacinth as being qualified, even though Flora will turn 50 before the Olympics. Actually the time is for Canadian Kimberly Hyacinthe and she wasn't even the best Canadian IN THAT RACE.[1] But Canada is not even listed in the wikipedia section. IAAF is inaccurate, wikipedia is also inaccurate and incomplete. WP:BRD I'm going to blank the section. I'll leave the layout but it should not be visible for another +- 10 months, until actual Olympic team memberships are named. Trackinfo (talk) 19:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC) No booth Hyacinthe are on the IAAF timelist fore 2015. The canadian Hyacinthe is on 48 place, and the Virginisland Hyacinthe on 96 places.[reply]

Reading in greater detail, relay NOC representation has been decided from the 2015 IAAF World Relays, so I will replace that section. Trackinfo (talk) 20:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trackinfo, you should know that not every race can be counted to the qualification process, only the ones that is approved by IAAF. Bearas (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure?

I've critiqued this kind of stuff before. How do we know, now in April 2016, what athletes will be selected. Looking at Women's Pole Vault, Germany lists Lisa Ryzih, Silke Spiegelburg, Martina Strutz. True they all have the qualifying mark, but what about Katharina Bauer (already over 4.65), what about the handful of other German women who are close to the qualifying mark? What is to say these three women will get selected in a few months? When there is only one athlete in a country capable of making the mark, possibly that is obvious, when there is competition, this is just someone playing WP:CRYSTAL an enthusiastic fan guessing game. I don't know the process in other countries. Before you post her; Do you? Trackinfo (talk) 07:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relays

Trackinfo You added the final composition of the relay teams. Please tell us where to get this information. Especially I am interested 4*400 meters Men relay and place of Ukraine in this ranking.--Yasnodark (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Athletics at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423104224/http://www.bahamasworldrelays.org:80/index.php/teams/qualifying-process to http://www.bahamasworldrelays.org/index.php/teams/qualifying-process

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]