Talk:Atherton, Greater Manchester/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well-referenced, well-illustrated GA-class article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well-referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well-referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Wide-ranging.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well-illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well-illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Another GA-class article. You're getting good at this. Congratulations on the quality. Pyrotec (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much, can I still eat the cake? It's all thanks to Malleus Fatuorum & Fingerpuppet really, especially MF who was so generous with his time. --J3Mrs (talk) 12:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes why not have a celebration - better send MF an extra big piece of cake. Pyrotec (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)