Talk:Athelm

Athelm has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 21, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 8, 2018 and January 8, 2023.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Athelm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Wulfhelm, this is a very good article on someone who, while notable, has little information available about him.

1. Well written?: Deals well with ambiguity, and covers the interesting aspects that make him notable clearly, despite difficulty.

2. Factually accurate?: Sources look quite good

3. Broad in coverage?: As said above, this article deals well with the conflict between notability and lack of information. It's short, but comprehensive.

4. Neutral point of view?: No issues

5. Article stability?: No issues

6. Images?: Not possible; as explained in the article, no coins exist with him, and I'm quite happy to believe that any other images are either obscure or unavailable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing reference

There is a footnote referring to "Dolley "Important Group" British Museum Quarterly", but this item does not appear in the references. Ælfgar (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Just an oversight ... happens. Nice catch, thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]