Talk:Atex (software)

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

any body has an article about atex approvals. how they are given? how are they classified? - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.174.110.106 (talk • contribs).

The article appears to be an advert for the company with lots of unverifiable statements. The header is pure puff. What is "a technology company"? I would submit that it is a great deal less significant for an encylopedia than the Atex directives (for which the above user was obviously looking) and should not be the lead for ATEX. Chemical Engineer 10:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ATEX directive already exists as an article. It's on the top of the article as a "see also" - and you're right about this article needing work, although Atex is a major company within the newspaper-production industry. - DavidWBrooks 21:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disamb Atex. Mion (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atex (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100127134527/http://blog.atex.com:80/? to http://blog.atex.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]