Talk:At Last

Beyoncé Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beyoncé, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beyoncé on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeyoncéWikipedia:WikiProject BeyoncéTemplate:WikiProject BeyoncéBeyoncé articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

1

Pop music blather

Way too much space is taken up on both the Celine Dion and Beyoncé versions and should be severely trimmed.

2606:6000:FECF:4100:4C4A:FE70:EB8A:A1F9 (talk) 06:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Osborne cover

I honestly don’t see the problem with including this since MTV has even covered on this which was sourced. I mean if we’re not going to include this then why are we including Christina Aguilera singing the song at Etta’s funeral? Joan covered the song for a movie. What’s the difference? All is sourced. @Muhandes: you’re stating from WP:SONGCOVER — “only cover versions/renditions important enough to have gained attention in their own right should be listed“ It clearly gained attention if MTV is writing about it. Is that not enough attention? I mean this can easily be argued and I hope other editors will join in on this discussion.Pillowdelight (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, so if you feel another rendition should not be listed, remove it. As for Joan Osborne's rendition, all we have is MTV saying In addition to the Osborne song "At Last," which clearly does not suffice as "gained attention", it is simply a listing. --Muhandes (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think this would be considered a reliable source but in the description it states “ Joan Osborne's rendering of Etta James' erstwhile theme song "At Last" is a classy, blues-y and luxurious update.”[1] Pillowdelight (talk) 19:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this seems like a sales blurb, not a secondary source giving it any attention. --Muhandes (talk) 20:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]