Talk:Astyages

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Untitled

The accuracy of this article is virtually hopeless, filled with myth, and historical inaccuracy. I do not even know where to start with corrections, so I won't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Malone (talk • contribs) 16:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Azhi Dahâk

The linguistic link between the name of Astyages and Azhi Dahâk mentioned at the head of the article are not proven. The former is the (helenized) name of a historical king, while the latter is the name of mythical demon of considerably older tradition. The connection between the two names was assumed because the helenized word sounded like the name of the mentioned demon. Babylonian documents have since showed us the real pronouciation of the name of the king (Ishtu vighu), which has no connection with Azhi Dahâk. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mirfakhr (talk • contribs) 22:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

According to M.R. Izady the name is Rshti-vega Azhi Dahak, Azhi Dahak being an honorific royal title. If the documents you mention above are mentioning "Ishtu vighu" it should be remembered that theese documents are in probably pronounced as the babylonians would pronounce it, however it does not prove that this is the actual pronounciation used by the Medes themselves, it's the same case as with Herodotos greek pronounciation.

In the case of the difference between the historical king and the demon one should remember that Azhi Dahak is the dragon(demon) king according to Zoroastrian mythology. This is explained by Izady as: "There is now compelling evidence that the slaying of Zoroaster himself and the overthrowing of is patron king Vishaspa were at the hands of the troops of King Rishti-vega Azhi Dahak, as he advanced eastward into Harirud-Murghab river basins in northwest Afghanistan in 522 BC. This did not help Azhi Dahak's reputation among the early Zoroastrians. The Median king Azhi Dahak has since been assigned a demonic character and is seen as the arch villain in both Zoroastrianism and the Iranian national mythology and epic literature, like the Shahnama.[...] The controversial title Azhi Dahak for the last median king was already known to Herodotus, albeit in a corrupted form, as Astyages."

Thus the historical king and the demon king are the same person (the demon king being based on the historical one), the latter however being a Zoroastrian demonisation of the historical king.

Cambyses II

"...returning him to Cambyses II and Mandane in Anshan." It should be Cambyses I?Vints 11:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Secular???

I've removed the "clash of civilizations" paragraph because it makes some dubious claims without backing them up, it's not appropriate in an encyclopedia, it isn't neutral...

Describing Zoroastrianism as an "eastern prophet-based religion" in contrast to Lydia, home of the cult of Cybele is incomprehensible. Isn't Croesus best known for his obsession with prophecy? Someone just tacked together the words "eastern" "prophet" and "religion" because they decided that the Medians are the bad guys and they don't like religion.

The phrase "explosion of secular thought in the west" in particular proves that this isn't to be taken seriously. What can the word "secular" possibly have to do with Lydia 2600 years ago? What is that even supposed to mean? Can anyone imagine what a "secular thought" would be in that setting? Is it meant to be a joke? Or did someone just pick a word that they had a lot of feelings about?

Finally, there's no reason why you get to throw NPOV out the window here and take the side of Croesus.

Abu America (talk) 23:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

The 13:21, 9 February 2010 192.114.91.226 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand a stub.--Wing (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1AtyagesandCyrus.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:1AtyagesandCyrus.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Astyages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808084750/http://www.personal.psu.edu:80/amp5364/HangingGardens.html to http://www.personal.psu.edu/amp5364/HangingGardens.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vedic??

There may be indeed historical connections between the ancient Iranians and the earliest Vedic peoples, but to describe Astyages as "a follower of the Vedic religion" is just baseless. 213.55.221.149 (talk) 10:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]