Talk:Aston Martin Cygnet

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aston Martin Cygnet redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Aston Martin Cygnet. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Aston Martin Cygnet at the Reference desk.

Automobiles

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles

Brands

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles

Rename to Aston Martin Cygnet

The naming convention for new articles in the automobile project is manufacturer followed by model name. Eg 'Toyota iQ'. Stepho-wrs (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Should I put in the move request? roguegeek (talk·cont) 22:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to Toyota iQ

This article isn't really big enough to sit by itself. It would be better off remaining as a section within Toyota iQ. We should only consider making a separate article once that section gets big enough. This article should be replaced with a link to Toyota iQ#Aston Martin Cygnet. Stepho-wrs (talk) 13:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, if the Dodge Stealth article is merged into the Mitsubishi GTO, then this should be merged, if nobody say anything within a week, then I will without hesitation. Donnie Park (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The comments are subjective

As an article in an encyclopedia, this article should be free of personal opinions. Author's mention of BBC persons point of view is obviously a subjective point of view and should be erased as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.123.123.117 (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]