Talk:Assyrian independence

Assyrian independence was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 2, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
November 27, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Trying to copy edit this article

However, I hm having trouble understanding it. For example, it seems to say that the British wanted an alliance with the Assyrians for reasons of geographic location. But it sounds like the Assyrians had already been kicked out of their homeland, so where were they and what was important to the British about there geographic location?

I'm sorry that I don't know enough about this history, but if you want the average Wikipedia reader to understant what is going on, I recommend that the article be more concise. All the detial clouds the underlying issues for me, and I'm probably average. KarenAnn 20:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read:

KarenAnn 20:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But it sounds like the Assyrians had already been kicked out of their homeland, so where were they and what was important to the British about there geographic location? - Britian had 2 issues with the region; 1. It wanted to colonize what was then "Mesopotamia" (or Iraq today,) with the support of Assyrian army, it was a done deal for the Brits to Colonize Iraq by marging them into Iraq's army. 2. They needed the Assyrian army also to counter Turkish attacks that was trying to take control of Mosul and its surrounding, which has a big oil field. The Brits wanted to make sure Mosul would be part of Iraq in the future for oil issues (since Iraq was going to be a colonial of Britian.) Chaldean 22:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in the article: Turkey then massed its troops on the border to occupy the Mosul (Nineveh) Province by force. The Assyrian Levy Force of 2000 was sent north to protect Iraq, since the Iraqi army at this time was unfit to undertake such task. The Assyrian force was largely responsible for the annexation of Mosul (Nineveh) to Iraq rather than to Turkey Chaldean 22:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer

I appreciate your trying to help me understand. The Assyrian issue is very confusing. If you want other people to understand the situation (average people in the world) it would be good to pick out the main points you want to get across and emphasize those. Just a general outline, so people can get the overall picture.

Until I started trying to copy edit this article I had no idea about all this. Then I read your Talk pages and such and see that the issues are very complicated. But for the rest of the world, you want people to know who the Assyrians are, where they are, what they have been promised and why, and what (in general) is the situation now. All the details aren't important in getting across your overall points -- that you want the world to recongnize that the Assyrians are to be considered and treated fairly. KarenAnn 23:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not being very clear.I am trying to improve my English everyday (I think I've come a long way if you look at my first edits :D ). Chaldean 01:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your English seems to me quite good. KarenAnn 01:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think the Assyrian genocide (another very bad written article) needs to be mentioned in this page. It was an important event of this topic. Chaldean 01:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I put some links to Assyrian genocide in the first section ( World War I and genocide) and also in the See also section. Do you think that works? KarenAnn 13:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea that was good. Thanks Chaldean 14:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for move

If you do a google search on "Assyrian administartive" [1], you get more results then "Assyrian indepedence" [2] (and with half of the independence results coming from wiki. What started as an independence movement is now more a battle for self rule, in terms of autonomy. Today, Assyrians in Iraq are actually very patriotic about being Iraqi and they dont really want to split off. The reason for indepedence has been brought up again today is because of the potential of a new Kurdistan state that would incude there land as well. Notice how Assyrians always wave Iraqi flags: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] So in conclusion, I think the page should be moved to something else, but I really dont know what. Chaldean 13:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So you want to change the title to "Assyrian administrative" (or is it "Assyrian administrative unit")? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, because the article seems to be discussing Assyrian independence (and there has never been an Assyrian administrative unit in place). Cosika 02:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GAC on Hold

The article is good but it needs more citations. Some sections do not have any citations. If you add citations to the sections that do not have any I would be happy to pass the article. Good luck. Kyriakos 04:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more hopefully it helps. Nareklm 13:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

congratulations, the article has passed it's GAC. I would have liked to have the quotes citated but the articlehas enough citations. Bye. Kyriakos 21:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1923-1932

Prehaps somebody should upload an image of the Assyrian state circa 1923-1932?

Fair use rationale for Image:OaklandTribune 1922.jpg

Image:OaklandTribune 1922.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 17:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Delisting

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of November 27, 2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.
The biggest problem with this article is that far too many sections are entirely unreferenced. In addition, there are also concerns of tone and WP:MoS, especially since I do not feel that the lead adequately summarized the article per the guidelines set out in WP:LEAD. Cheers, CP 22:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

"Assyrian question" sounds like the name of a book. Google favores Independence by a 4 to 1 margin [[8]] [[9]]. Chaldean (talk) 17:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian independence has multiple meanings, such as, for instance, the independence of Assyria from the Mitannis, etc. When this was brought up to the League of Nations, they called it the Assyrian Question. — EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 03:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A single event determines the name of the subject? I can't agree with that. "Assyrian independence" is described what is meant by the title in its first sentence, so I don't know how one would confuse that with indepenence from hte Mitannis. And besides, the independence movement began way before that League of Nation meeting. Chaldean (talk) 05:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, but I still think it should be at least mentioned in the lead, aka Assyrian Question. — EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 08:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine. Chaldean (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanese Civil War

I was just wondering if there is any information about the Assyrian involvement in the Lebanese Civil War. I've heard that some went to Lebanon to fight along the Christian militias. Just want some sources etc. Malik Danno (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assyrian autonomy map 2003.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Assyrian autonomy map 2003.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Assyrian autonomy map 2003.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

See the Talk Page of Assyrian struggle for independence for the transferred "proposed merger discussion" content which used to be here. Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Add Additional Comments Regarding This Merger Here... They Will Be Missed.