Talk:Assured clear distance ahead
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
US centric?
[edit]Thank you for creating this article. However, it currently reads like at article aimed only at US readers and only refers only to US legal system. I suggest that it needs to be generalised to cover other jurisdictions and include references to international sources (OECD? WHO? etc). This would make it much more useful. PeterEastern (talk)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Assured Clear Distance Ahead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531182754/http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22358_5.htm to http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22358_5.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge proposal: Following distance into Assured clear distance ahead
[edit]I propose merging Following distance into Assured clear distance ahead. They seem to be about the same topic (although the current format of Following distance is much easier to digest). Sauer202 (talk) 15:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I lightly disagree, though ACDA is the general rule and thus includes following distance, ACDA might be too broad compared to following distance to warrant the merge. ACDA seems to be more of a legal concept, while following distance is not (it might be regulated but exists regardless of law). ACDA also already has this section: Assured clear distance ahead#Dynamic "following" distance. Regardless, ACDA needs extensive copyediting for clarity, readability, and tone. (read for ex: "In this specific regard, jurisdictions which grant drivers the liberty to be fools from their own folly, are also condoning the collateral damage and life loss which is expected to occur.") HarryKernow (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clearly closely realted enough not to need separate pages, though I agree this page is overly detailed and complex. Reywas92Talk 14:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, given that Assured clear distance ahead is unduly technical, and would swamp the clear, focussed content in Following distance. That is, readers are best served by having the content remain separate. Klbrain (talk) 18:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)