Jump to content

Talk:Assumption of Mary in art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Actual views 8188 + 25

Expansion

[edit]

This article really needs to get expanded with text. There is plenty to write about, but as is it is just a list of items, + a gallery. And as is it is assumes (perhaps rightly so) the topic to be along the lines of Western depictions with Dormition of the Theotokos treated as a separate issue. That is probably a good separation, but it should at least be clarified. If no one else gets to it, I will try to do it by the end of the year, or thereabouts. History2007 (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better late than never! Johnbod (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk06:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas catches the belt
Thomas catches the belt

Created/expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 16:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

@The C of E: - ok now? Johnbod (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That seems OK however, @Johnbod: I have just noticed something that I missed last time. You nominated this on the 14th so I can only count expansion from the 7th and if I do that, this isn't a 5x expansion. Can you explain this? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's listed under 6 Jan, when the expansion began (at 20:10 pm to be precise). So you can (and should) stretch it by 3hrs 50 m to allow for a slightly late nomination. Johnbod (talk) 19:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
PS: See Wikipedia:Did you know/Not exactly. Johnbod (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. This is highly irregular to me but I am happy to accept the reference to policy you provide (we might need to look at that later on). Nevertheless, the hook is now more clearly cited inline, the picture licence is fine and there is no close paraphrasing. Rest of the review as above. This is good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]