Jump to content

Talk:Association of Comics Magazine Publishers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What this page needs is a good-quality image of the ACMP symbol, which looked like a white star with the words "Conforms to the Comics Code." 68.76.223.250 18:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"...ignored by both large and small publishers..."

[edit]

Comics that complied with the code were offered a "Seal of Approval." The code, however, was not a success, ignored by both large and small publishers. Some publishers, such as Dell Comics, refused to join the organization. Others, such as founding member EC Comics, terminated their participation.

'ignored' seems either incorrect or vague. The above text lacks any data as to how long the various members stayed on. From the William M. Gaines interview, Comics Journal #81, May 2003, page 76:

GROTH: {...} You belonged to the very first Comics Code, although it probably wasn't called the Comics Code...
GAINES: Wait, there were three. The first one we didn't belong to because I wasn't even in comics then. I don't even know when... That was a long time ago, during my father's time. The second Code I belonged to...
GROTH: But you quit after about two or three years.
GAINES: Oh, I think we were in longer than that.
GROTH: According to the Senate Subcommittee hearing, you droped out because of finances, because you had expected the other publishers to join and they didn't, and that you were paying the association about $3,000 a year which, was more than you could...
GAINES: Yeah but it seems like I was in there more than three years. But it's true. What it was, of course, was that the comic publishers like DC who weren't having a problem didn't want to be associated with me, or Marvel, or any of the others who were having a problem, so they didn't join. So the whole burden financially was on the few of us who were publishing horror and crimie comics. I can see their point of view. Maybe if I had been one of them I would have felt the same way about it. I also figured it was ridiculous. One by one other people started to drop out. Every time someone would drop out, everybody else had to pay more money, because the guy Schulz who was running the thing had to be paid. So finally I said to hell with it.

Perhaps we could have a list or table of every publisher that belonged, and for how long. --AC 07:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oy, I wrote this article before I really warmed to the idea of citing references. It could definitely use a general fact-check and footnotes. That said, I think I found the source for the allegation that the code was "ignored":

The early code carried little weight, however, since most publishers ignored it and the public was largely unaware of its significance.[1]

I agree that more detail would be better. Please jump in where you see fit. -- Shunpiker 13:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Association of Comics Magazine Publishers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Association of Comics Magazine Publishers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Association_of_Comics_Magazine_Publishers&oldid=1198350538"