Talk:Association of Car Rental Industry Systems Standards

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Acrisseeig (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (Diff of User talk:Diannaa)

20 March 2010

http://www.acriss.org/about_cars/ (broken link) Classification is wrong on wikipedia.
- Classification is now right [1] Vmeurisse (talk) 17:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah!

This explains how rental companies can say "Ford Mustang convertible or similar" and then make the hapless customer drive off in a Chrysler 200, when the only similarities are the folding roof and the number of wheels. Mr Larrington (talk) 03:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ACRISS Car Classification code edits

Help! I run ACRISS.org an non profit organisation responsible for setting standards in the car rental industry regarding the car codes, car locations, airport locations used in all booking systems and the car rental companies own booking systems. Our members noticed some errors in the Wikipedia pages and asked me to edit them but I have encountered problems as you can see from the responses you sent back. I own the copyright on the acriss.org page and happy to give permission to use some of the material from our website, equally happy to keep the wikipedia pages to a minimum. I was particularly keen to ensure the correct members are listed Avis, Budget, Hertz, Enterprise and Europcar but also that for the car classification code that you are referring to that the table I used be the one displayed but I am not sure how to format this. Also it is imperative that no example of car models are used in the pages as this information changes constantly and has already caused us complaints with the German and French version of ACRISS Car Classification page. The German version refers to Sixt rent a car who are no longer members and therefore should not get any credit for using or following our standards. I did not create this page but would like it to be accurate as much as possible and to be laid out correctly with content page and objective, history etc.. Happy to quote our website as the source material and even my name if that helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acrisseeig (talk • contribs) 10:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ACRISS Car Classification code edits - Formatting the table correctly

I understand the copyright issues and also the conflict of interest so will not make any further edits. I just would like to update the table in the ACRISS Car Classification code page to the correct format as requested by Wikipedia. The content of the car classification table has not changed but I tried to reformat the table and unfortunately got it wrong but do not know how to format it correctly or return it to its original format in Wikipedia.

The rest of the page, I do not wish to change as the ACRISS.org website has any additional information if someone wants more information. Would be happy for additional information on the codes to be added but this can be done by someone else as long as examples of car models/types are not listed against an example of a code as this information constantly changes and can be misleading.