Jump to content

Talk:Associação Chapecoense de Futebol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1rd

[edit]

The infobox says "Catarinense 1rd". In English, first is 1st, second is 2nd, and third is 3rd. Were they 1st or 3rd? Art LaPella (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed Art LaPella (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Associação Chapecoense de Futebol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team logo deletion discussion

[edit]

The team logo is being discussed for deletion on Wikimedia Commons here. AHeneen (talk) 11:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review accepted revision

[edit]

I recently accepted four pending changes. Nothing looked worthy of reversion, however the third kit was added and I'm not sure of the policy or style guides around football kits. If someone more familiar with these policies could review that to make sure it's a legitimate third kit and complies with policy and wikiproject style guides, that would be appreciated. Wugapodes [thɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 21:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2008

[edit]

Missing in the season list. Did they not play a league? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koppapa (talkcontribs) 17:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Koppapa: they didn't play at national level in 2008 as they did not qualify for the 2008 Campeonato Brasileiro Série C. When the Série D was introduced in 2009, they re-entered the national structure. Hack (talk) 02:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Associação Chapecoense de Futebol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]