Talk:Asset health management

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... It is not promoting any single company or product but is instead trying to talk about the wider field of asset health management and to highlight the different approaches that have been formalized, the methods that existed before them and a sense of the field within which they are used. I would suggest that the deletion category used here is completely inappropriate. --JPelham (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had originally tagged it that way because it seemed to be promoting the concept described, but it might just have been the way I interpreted what was written so I removed the speedy tag. It still does need reliable sources and the other issues I put tags for. 331dot (talk) 18:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would direct your attention to IVHM which is my other article. This will obviously be very quickly ramped up to the same high standards. -- JPelham (talk) 18:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]