Talk:Assegai

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	African military history task force

Article in dire need of expansion or merger or something...

The Assegai has a long history as a weapon of war in the middle east and north africa, yet someone reading this article who didn't know any better would assume that it's some novel weapon subsaharan africans used in the 1900s. There is no mention of the vast majority of the weapon's history.

No title

-John Bowser- Discovered the Information on Southern Africa in the Big Book of Battles and a Book by Grayham Worseley, Rorkes Drift ... Removed from article Htaccess (talk) 05:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing headers

Article is called Assegai... section called Assegai? More like Assegais in native African culture? 75.156.69.71 (talk) 04:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The intro states that the assegai is a pole weapon comparable to the roman "hasta" (and other members of the spear family) used for throwing. However, the article on the "hasta" specifically (and correctly) states that the hasta was NOT used for throwing. Anyone interested in clearing this up? Otherwise I would simply delete the hasta from the list. Koo Kee (talk) 15:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have consulted a number of dictionaries (OED, Oxford Dictionaries, Merriam Webster, American Heritage dictionary re citation in article, Wiktionary, and the Dutch language Van Dale) and I believe the link to the Latin 'hasta' may be an error on the source's part (maybe a false cognate?) I will therefore remove it entirely. Francoisdjvr (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! This looks much better now. Koo Kee (talk) 11:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]