Talk:Assassing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sadly nothing is written about the "Cinderella Search" here. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.30.192.205 (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason not to delete

'Assassing' is not a protologism in the sense that the article was created to promote the jargon word 'assassing' to a neologism - it is the title of a song.

The second count is notability I think. Marillion are a notable band, having had top ten singles and albums for more than two decades in various countries. Assassing is considered as one of their 'anthem' songs. It should be noted that I have only tonight created about three articles on other Marillion songs before my attention was drawn to the 'notability' guideline. For the minute, I will stop creating other such articles until I have looked through lists of other song articles to see if such articles are widely challenged. If I determine that there are a high number of them that are 'only as' or 'less' notable than released singles by Marillion, then I will continue creating entries. --Mal 00:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the article as written is that it did not assert the notability of the song and was in general, much too short. The info should have been included on the main album page. I merged the content back to the album page but kept the title as a redirect. If you want to come back and greatly expand it (significance, references, analysis of lyrics, etc) could can undo the redirect at that time. Thatcher131 04:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Assassing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012195559/http://www.everyhit.com/searchsec.php to http://www.everyhit.com/searchsec.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]