Talk:Assassination of Wade Perrin

Assassination of Wade Perrin has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 3, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: South Carolina / History / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Assassination of Wade Perrin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that South Carolina legislator Wade Perrin was assassinated by members of the Ku Klux Klan the day after being re-elected?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Assassination of Wade Perrin.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Wade Perrin in 1870

... that Wade Perrin (pictured) was assassinated by members of the Ku Klux Klan the day after being re-elected? Source: "Whites in Laurensville killed at least a dozen Republicans on 20 October...among the victims was Wade Perrin, whom the vote count showed to have been re-elected to a second term in the state house of representatives.
- ALT1: ... that South Carolina legislator Wade Perrin (pictured) was assassinated by members of the Ku Klux Klan the day after being re-elected? Source: Same as ALT0.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kwaku Ohene-Frempong

Created by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 03:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image eligibility:

Freely licensed:
Used in article:
Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: After a good look through, I think ALT1 is better as most people are likely to not know who Perrin is, so having a description is helpful. Hook is interesting and everything looks good. Happy to pass. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 00:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Assassination of Wade Perrin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Luxtaythe2nd (talk · contribs) 11:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a point-by-point review of this article. Because the review requires me to do rather intense checking across the article, I will be doing this one by one. Helping and pointing out issues with the review is welcome.

Well written:
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable

spelling and grammar are correct

it complies with the manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,

layout,

words to watch,

fiction,

and list incorporation
The article is well-written and avoids weasels whenever it can. Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 11:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged

it contains no original research

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism
Sources are all good, maybe could use more variety. No original research found, nearly every sentence is cited.
Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the main aspects of the topic

it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Relatively short but swell. Compared to its size, it's interesting how many guidelines it checks out. Halfway through. Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 12:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Review done! Phew. Generally, I'd say this article, while pushing limits in some areas, is a good article. Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 14:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]