Talk:Aspergillus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aspergillus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled

this genus is important in terms of eukaryotic riboswitch examples. Needs a section on this. 68.148.12.223 (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional picture

A. nidulans is used as a research organism.

Today I took a very detailed picture of aspergillus and uploaded it to commons. Should it be included here? Is it of any value for the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Multimotyl (talk • contribs) 21:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh! Yes, nice picture! Two questions though:

Do you know what the round structures are? Sporangia? Or why some are white and others black? These might be good details to add to the caption. Someone at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fungi could surely help.
More importantly, are you sure the fungus is an Aspergillus? If not, it would probably be better to have the picture on mold or sporangium or whatever instead.

Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 03:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what are the round structures, but I have asked my friend who studies biology at the university about the fungus and she told me that it's Aspergillus. I'm not biologist, but curious photographer :-)Multimotyl (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think some expert's opinion is needed here. I'm no expert, but I think Aspergillus' hyphae should NOT be possible to see like that without an actual microscope, I think these are much larger molds. If these were Aspergillus, the conydia should be around 2 micrometers, so the little "spheres" seen in the picture would be around 20 micrometers. At that size the tomato's cells should be evident, and I do not think there's a camera that can actually "zoom" that much. Sorry if my vocabulary wasn't technical enough, English is not my main language.

Chirigami (talk) 05:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we'd need Multimotyl to confirm, but I assumed these photographs were taken using a microscope. Neither photograph's focal plane passes through the surface of the tomato, so that would explain why we can't see tomato cells. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 09:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all, this picture was taken by an improvised micro lens. Width of this picture in real life is about 1 cm.

Multimotyl (talk) 11:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of context reference to mites removed

I can't understand why the following sentences appear in the middle of the intro:

Mites are common associate with mold as they occur in nature. Mites are in size commonly just about at the limit of visibility by the unaided eye.

This comment doesn't add anything to the topic and looks as if someone just popped it in for no good reason. It is also very ungrammatical. I am removing it because of those reasons.

If it actually can be cleaned up and made relevant, it might be able to be used elsewhere in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.204.82 (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mechanism of sake fermentation

Koji mold is not used to ferment sake, as stated in the article, but rather to break down the starches into sugars that the yeasts can process into alcohol. Sake is brewed using a process called "multiple parallel fermentation," in which the koji and yeast are active simultaneously. 67.40.184.142 (talk) 22:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Aspergillus/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

strengths: medium amount of content, fair information, as well as fairly well formatted. Basically doesnt meet b criteria because, while it has those strengths, they need to be magnified in a sense. Needs more information, more content and more references before B class met. —ÅñôñÿMôús _{Dîššíd3nt} 03:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspergillus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050512094530/http://moldacrossamerica.org:80/ASPPAPER%20LC.pdf to http://www.moldacrossamerica.org/ASPPAPER%20LC.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Common Name

Does anyone know a common name for this family? 2600:387:F:812:0:0:0:9 (talk) 01:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]