Talk:Aspen Achievement Academy

USER VIOLATING WIKIPEDIA RULES ON DISPUTES ABOUT ACCURACY

You cannot simply remove the dispute tag because you disagree that the material is disputed. This material is clearly filled with inaccuracies, mispresentations, and bias. It does not follow the NPOV policy of Wikipedia.

---

Clearly the use of the word "detainee" is biased and unnecessary. The government requires students go to school all day - does that make them detainees? Many students throughout the country go to boarding schools and the like - are they detainees as well? It is a loaded word meant to give the impression this is a prison, which it is NOT.

The independent research study, conducted by the Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare Research Cooperative (OBHRC) at the University of Minnesota, conducted the nation’s first large-scale study researching the effectiveness of outdoor behavioral healthcare in treating teen substance use issues - and the outcomes were very positive. One person with a personal grudge should not be writing these entries when thousands of students have benefited from the Aspen Achievement Academy's therapeutic wilderness experience. Rmagick 20:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thier are many hidden secrets in these programs.

Detainee

If all the children would seek partipation in the program volentary, I would not call them detainees. But they dont. They are tricked there or transported there in handcuffs by an youth transport company.

If they could leave if the program became too hard, they wouldn't be detainees either. But they can not. Those two video clips show extensive use of force.

I dont feel a grudge against Aspen as a company. I am only interested in describing systems that detains people without the detainees having their day in court. I have tried to make it NPOV, like when I adjusted a page about a KZ-camp. I have to acknowledge that evil is hard to describe NPOV. How would you describe a KZ-camp? As a holliday retreat?

I live in a country where we take it very seriously, when a person are to be locked up. We demand a trial. Maybe this point of view is biased.

Covergaard 21:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Specious Argument

When a parent finds out their 14-year-old child is doing methamphetamines, having sex with older teens, and flunking school, that parent has a moral obligation to get help for that child regardless of the child's desire for help. When the child turns 18 and the parent is no longer legally or morally or ethically responsible, the person then has free will to damage themselves, although they do not truly have free will if it breaks laws or impacts others. They may end up in low-paying jobs (no education) or in jail for DUI's or drug possession - a consequence certainly far worse than a rough trek through the wilderness. Using one example of an incident to indict a program as a whole is ridiculous. It would be like suggesting if 50,000 people a year die in car accidents, cars are inherently bad and we should get rid of them. Look at public schools - do you really think public schools in urban areas are a pleasure to be "forced" to go to - yet hundreds of thousands of students are every year.

The suggestion that children do everything voluntarily is a silly, nonsensical argument. When I was a child my parents MADE me go to school (and so did the government of the United States until I was 16). There are many rights given to adults that are not given to children - and it is absurd to think a 12 year old has the decision-making capacity of a 40-year-old parent.

Children do bad things in my country too

When things goes out of hand with drug use etc. we as parents turn to our authorities. We pay our taxes for that purpose.

They have drug treatment, social workers, hospitals etc. We can ask our doctor for involuntary treatment too. He fills out, what we call a "red form". The police (special trained staff) comes for the child if the parents can not take the child to treatment themselves. The child is commited to treatment. Then the child gets a social worker, which looks into the case. She works like a lawyer and take the papers to court. Then a judge has to sanction the treatment too.

It is totally impossible for my to force my child to treatment without cause even if I pay the doctor off. There is still a social worker and a judge to consider.

Yes all children has to attend school. If they dont show up, our authorities show up at the home address. In order to make sure that we are not talking about an attempt to hide child abuse (Sometimes parents keeps the child home, so bruised can remain undetected.), they either arrange for a pick-up arrangement or an alternative school environment. We don't have very many boarding schools in order to maintain a proper family structure, so an alternative school environment is often something which are done locally. In my town we have family classes (Parents are compensated so they can come to the school and supervise their child in public school), we have a special class where they are taught in school 2-3 days a week for 8-10 hours and taken out in nature for the rest of the week (Perhaps they have ADHD etc. and need to be exercised in order to use as little medication as necessary.) We have a lot of possibilities within our public school system.

If that is not enough, then we are talking hospitals, because then they are really ill. Then we are talking real treatment with real doctors.

But the pupils can leave the school when classes are not taught. They can go to a shop across the street if they like. They can see their family unstricted when they are not in school.

They are not detained!

Covergaard 22:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

These children can leave Aspen

All it takes is a phone call from their parents and they'll head home. The parents sent them there, and give permission for them to stay, so the parents are the ones who are really "detaining" them. Maybe you think that's bad parenting. Maybe when parents voluntarily send their children to foster homes or put them up for adoption or make them do ballet, that's bad parenting too. That's a valid opinion, but unfortunately, not really the issue here. I agree that "detained" is way too emotive. Linking to criticisms, or at least spelling them out calmly, is better than making criticisms through emotive language. Callivert (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• But that is the point. The children are during the program not given the possibility to tell their parents what happen. They can write home if the letter makes it through, but during the entire program the parents speak with a staff member with no interest in letting the parents know who bad things are because this staff member has a job. Keeping the children in the program IS his paycheck.
  
  That why a poor child had no option but to hang himself when he got too depressed by not coping the desert life. He did choose a fast exit instead of starving.
  
  Four recent Utah deaths in treatment programs Facility put on probation, but free to take new clients, By Kirsten Stewart, Salt Lake Tribune, October 13, 2007 (Reprint from COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE - a referral firm)
  
  We live in 2008. The children should be granted a weekly satellite phone call. They have not been convicted in court. They are not "innocent until proven guilty". They are in fact detainees caught in between the laws
  
  Covergaard (talk) 10:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Removed a couple of links

First, we have a DMCA (copyright) complaint about the links to the videos.

Second, the videos did not seem to contain any internal evidence that they have anything at all to do with the program in question.

I also removed some of the criticism section, not with any eye towards POV editing of course, but because it was badly written and not really justified. Remember, Wikipedia must not take a stand on any controversial issue. We need better sourcing for this article all around, if we want it to be an excellent article. --Jimbo Wales 19:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

This isn't a controversial issue, this is fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.253.137 (talk) 15:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

The videos.

I have located them on cafety's homepage [1], where they claim that they were taken in relationship with the third season of the TV-show Brat Camp, which were filmed at AAA.

I have seen the show and they are in fact right. These clips are from AAA.

It is kind of funny or sad. But her mom did not care a bit about the footage [2] and she managed to sell her house so her daughter could remained locked up at Excel Academy, regardless of the fact that she was not convicted in court. Talk of hate.

However, because it have been impossible to find out whether they have obtained copyright to publish those two scenes, which were very adequate for the entire show, I have to agree that the link should not be on the page.

Covergaard 07:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The DMCA complaint was from the producers of Brat Camp. I guess they don't like that cafety.org has the clips up without permission. I will keep following up on this. It sounds like you have a strong POV on the subject matter here, so please be careful with your editing to make sure it is neutral. But in this case, Aspen Academy is not complaining, so.... --Jimbo Wales 13:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I haven't seen the videos of "abuse" but I've seen the entire documentary "Brat Camp" from which they are apparently taken. The documentary series, when watched in its entirety, shows Aspen in a fairly positive light. I don't think that you could watch it and draw the conclusions that many are making here. Therefore, if a small slice of that documentary seems to prove otherwise, then it's it's because it's taken out of context. Possibly that was the intention. Callivert (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

NPOV Comments

Jimbo - this user goes throughout wikipedia writing about this program and others using very biased information and language. He uses the word "detainee" and if I try to change it to "student" he simply reverts it. It may be because English is his second language and he does not understand the connotations of the word - a political prisoner or a juvenile in police custody. It is clearly a very biased word. He seems to have backed down a bit on deleting new factual information added, whereas in the beginning he simply reverted the entries to his original. I will be happy to get the formal complaint from Aspen Achievement Academy about the videos or any other materials in question, but we are not sure where to send these.

But they are detained there. What better word is there in the english language?

Please explain me what word you would use for a person escorted to a place, he or her did not choose. Please state a better word for a child removed from his or her own bed in handcuffs. Please explain me, what word you will use for a person held back in a place against his or her will.

If you can find a better word than detainee for a person undergoing such a torment, please state it.

I live in another culture, where authorities - the court system - has to convict a person to treatment. I can not do it - not even to my own child or my grandparents, if they have become senile. I have to go to a doctor. He has to sign either a "yellow" or a "red" note depending of how fast treatment is needed. Then we have special trained policemen to take the person in question to treatment, but ....

The person can ask for a lawyer and he can ask for a judge to decide whether treatment is needed or not. If the person is a child, the social welfare system is also monitoring the case. Perhaps it is the parent, which has done something inappropiate with the child using the "treatment" to hide their abuse. It has been the case in the states.

Please watch this TV-documentary about one of Aspen competitors [3]. Here you have a school, which was involved in hiding a girl, who family was about to be investigated for child abuse. WWASP as the competitor is named is running the exact kind of business as Aspen do. Same kind of treatment, same kind of abuse. Those two companies are totally alike. Both companies has suicides and deaths among the children in their care. Aspen is just a little better when it comes to marketing.

Covergaard 05:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Shall We All Be Danes?

Here you make another error in argument. You are trying to impose not only your personal beliefs, but your cultural beliefs, on others.

In Denmark, as you have stated earlier, you have to get the police and courts involved - in America, it is concerned shameful and horrifying to involve the police and courts in personal family business.

Aspen Education Group can not be compared to the WWASP programs - that is a COMPLETELY different animal and if you had any real knowledge of these matters you would know that they can not be compared at all to them. None of the top people with therapeutic programs respects that organization. It shows just how completely uneducated you are about what really happens in these schools - you use a few anecdotes forgetting the thousands who have been helped, who have had their lives saved. For every 1 person you can find who will say negative things - there are 100 who will say it changed their lives for the better. What has happened to logical, scientific argument? Is public education in Denmark as bad as it is here so that you are unable to see your arguments are poorly formed and even more poorly supported?

No we shall not all be Danes but we should be humans

I know that we are from different cultures. This morning I heard the that the terrorist in Cuba can not take their case before a judge in the States. Not only as a Dane but also as an European I find this step odd.

In our culture sickness that is not physically is regarded shameful. People change their last name before they undergo treatment - even voluntary treatment. That is why we dont convict people simple battery to anger management and likewise witchcraft but give them a sentence for 20 days. We have no juvenile court so even children gets to go to ordinary prisons. I think we all agree that it is better to serve once time than having your personality wiped out.

But all people have their day in court. Before I wrote this article I researched these program, by watching the TV-show, I interviewed some people, who have been in the program and they ended up in two groups:

• The unsatisfied that stated they were treated badly and have waited until they became 18 before they could resume an ordinary life without the risk of being sent back.
• The satisfied that stated their lives were saved by the program. For some reason every kind of treatment - Even High Impact had satisfied people that stated that they needed the stay in a dog cage and to eat their own vomit in order to save their life. There was not difference between Aspen and WWASP when it comes to the statement from satisfied graduates. So my conclusion is that quality in the treatment program has not impact regarding how satisfied the graduates are.

Now the industry talks about self-regulation rather than legislation. But I have not been able to find just one statement from Aspen publicly stating that WWASP delivers poor quality. Dr. Phil came close in this show [4] but he did not dare to annouce their name publicly (And he seems to be sponsors by Aspen). They are not so different as they want us to think.

Still you dont need to be a Dane. I have even checked up on the European Charter regarding detaining people without the use of the court-system. This charter seems to support my point of view. Perhaps you should state that I think as a European. If any person from Europe should have written this page, the outcome would be as you dislike.

Covergaard 20:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Arguments Are Based on False Premises

To state that people were in dog cases and had to eat their own vomit shows that you are simply an unreasonable person. There is no point in trying to continue any discussion with you.

Staged photo or the real thing from Mexican authorities?

Please look at this link. (Upper right corner) [5]

I am ready for an argument. Are you?

Covergaard 21:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I felt like a detainee

It is not my intent to become involved in an argument over the proper use and definition of the word "detainee". However, this debate has been recently brought to my attention, and I feel the need to contribute. As an Aspen Achievement Academy "alumni" or survivor, the question of whether or not I felt like a "detainee" has been posed to me. The answer to that question is "yes". This is my story: I ask that any parent thinking about enrolling their child in The Aspen Achievement Academy, to please reconsider. As a former student of the program myself, this request stems from my first hand experiences in the program. Please be for warned that the organization’s advertisements are misleading. I did not see any of the literature provided to my parents until after my return from Utah. After the initial review of a videotape, and several pamphlets provided by the program, I was disgusted. Aspen did not accurately portray itself. My parents were shocked when I came home and they saw the evidence in my backpack, and heard my stories. They had no idea what they had really signed me up for. According to advertisements for the Aspen Achievement Academy, the program resembled a rugged, yet therapeutic summer camp experience. In reality, this could not have been farther than the truth. It has been nearly twelve years since I spent those two months in the Utah wilderness, and my experience there still haunts me to this day. The extensive neglect that my fellow students and I experienced was unacceptable. I’ll never forget May 11th, 1994. It’s a date that will trouble me for the rest of my life. That morning two strangers awakened me at 5 am. They ordered me to get up and get dressed "because I was going to Utah for a long time". I told them "I couldn’t go to Utah; I had to go to school that day!" However, as it turned out I had no choice. After a lengthy physical struggle with these people, I found myself forced onto a second rate airplane (who’s ever heard of “Morris” airlines anyway?) bound for Salt Lake City. That day remains in my memory as one of the most emotionally devastating and difficult things I have ever been through. My family had betrayed me; they had forever destroyed my full trust in them. I remember before the program even started, they took us to a therapist, or maybe he was a psychiatrist (they refused to tell me anything), in Provo Utah. It was his job to be sure we were evaluated before being sent out into the desert. One of the worst moments in my life was when this man looked me in the eye and told me that he did NOT believe that I was a very good candidate for the program, but that he was going to recommend that I attend anyway. He said I seemed like a relatively normal and stable teenager. My heart sank; I could actually feel it. He validated this by saying that he thought the program would be good for anyone, even himself. I felt so helpless. He also told me that my parents had paid $23,000 for my time in the desert. I don’t know where that money went; because it certainly did not go to proper care and feeding of my fellow students and I. Sometimes I suspect that that psychiatrist in Provo saw a fair amount of it for his “recommendation”. All that money my parents spent, for me to just walk for 52 days. Against my will I walked in a line, over cow patties and large rocks, through a desert wasteland, day after day. I remember walking along sheer cliffs with no safety ropes or harnesses, eating from dirty and rancid dishes, and having to use our bare hands to dig up and relocate human "waste" on several occasions. But, I'm getting ahead of myself, all of that didn’t start until a few days later. The initial “evaluation” period in Utah lasted a couple more days. During that time I stayed with a family in Provo, Utah. The wife (sometimes literally) dragged me around town with her. I joined her while she did things like get her hair done and pick up her kids from school. The family talked to me about God and accepting the Mormon religion into their hearts. It was a confusing couple of days. No one would answer any of my questions. I wish now that I would have screamed and tried harder to run away while we were out in public. We went grocery shopping, and I stayed by her side. During the night I was forced to stay in the living room of her house, guarded by inferred sensitive alarms "so that I could not escape". At the time I thought maybe I was sent to Utah to stay with her. Obviously I had no idea what I was in for. She took me to be drug tested. I have no doubt that the results of this test came up clean. I also spent many hours filling out a lengthy “true or false” personality evaluation. I remember specifically questions such as “I am a secret messenger of God. True or False” and “I like to physically harm small animals. True or False.” It was insulting and humiliating to answer those questions, I wasn’t mentally ill. Looking back, I doubt anyone ever even looked at my answers anyway. I had no idea where I was, or why I was with this strange family. I slept on their couch for two nights. Then I was transported in a rickety van several hundred miles south to (what I now know was) a remote area of Southern Utah, near the Henry Mountains. That’s when the horror really started. During the initial days (called “Impact phase”) my fellow group members and I were forced to hike for hours on end with absolutely no food. Our bodies weren’t used to such grueling activity or carrying the primitive backpacks. Several kids screamed, cried and fought. Some collapsed and refused to go on. The counselors were all in good shape. They carried comfortable backpacks, and were able to eat. They stood by, laughing and talking amongst themselves, waiting for us to pick up the fallen victim, even drag them if necessary. I was too exhausted to even talk, let alone expend any energy on tears. They told us nothing; we were at their mercy. I really and truly thought we were going to die. My Mom wrote me a letter a week later, in which she said she had heard that the first phase was “pretty hard”. I resent that understatement to this day. Finally after a few days of “impact phase” we were given a little food (two over ripe bananas to be exact). Then, later the next day we got a little more, but it was never much. We were starving in Utah; I lost over 20 pounds, and I wasn’t overweight to begin with. We simply were not provided with adequate amounts of food. Often times we were given no food at all, or forced to hike, exhausted for many miles before any food was provided. On a good day, in the mornings we were able to eat half a cup of cold uncooked oatmeal, and then at night if we were lucky we could eat the same amount of cooked potatoes and rice. For a treat we occasionally ate salted pork fat or butter. If we could not start a fire this food was consumed raw. I still eat too fast, and too much as a result of this. To this day I still struggle with my weight and feel like I need to eat as much as possible. Before Utah, it wasn’t ever an issue for me. Furthermore, the healthcare was unacceptable. There were three specific instances that come to mind concerning this subject. The first concerns my knees. I was born with knee problems (a tendency for my kneecaps to dislocate). During my time with Aspen my knees dislocated twice. This was a preexisting condition, and in no way created by Aspen. However, after each incident I was allowed to rest for only a few minutes and then was forced to hike on the injury. I have still had persistent problems to this day. In fact, a couple of months ago I finally opted for surgery. The surgeon found extensive scar tissue and damage. I wonder how much of it came from those hikes. For the last month in Utah, I also walked on what felt (and looked) to be a broken toe. We were pushing a very heavy handcart that ran over my foot. I got the feeling that they didn’t really believe us when we were hurt. I was never examined, so I can’t be sure if it was broken, but the pain was excruciating for many weeks. At one point I contracted the stomach flu during the program. One of the counselors came in sick with it once, and I caught it. She got to go home immediately. Meanwhile, I spent three days hiking and vomiting. Eventually I had finally fainted and collapsed several times from the exhaustion, and medical help was brought in. They waited until I was lying helpless in the dirt, physically unable to continue. This was not an acceptable response. During my two months there, I was allowed to bathe only twice, both times in the same mud and cow filled streams that we drank from. I tried to do the best I could to stay clean, and splash my face with water daily, but it was difficult. Several of the girls got bladder infections. The second bath I took didn’t come until the very end of the program, right before our parents came. We had to stand in the mucky bottom of an icy stream and wash as best we could. Before our parents saw us, we had to wash and change into fresh clothes. If we didn’t then we couldn’t eat. We argued that we wanted them to see us as we really were, but there was never any reasoning with the staff. My Mom didn’t see the tattered truth of what I really wore until we were back home. I remember her crying when she did. The web site for aspen Achievement Academy contains photos of clean, smiling teenagers. Their clothes are not in rags. There is even a picture of pensive teenagers sitting around a campfire, with a box of hot chocolate in front of them! There is no way we were ever given anything like hot chocolate! These photos in no way resemble the reality. Often times we drank from streams with high sulfur content that made us very sick. More often than not the water in my jug was brown. Sometimes there was even brine shrimp swimming around in it. I’ll never forget the feeling of them squirming on my tongue as I tried to swallow the gritty water, always to the sound of a counselor saying “come on suck it down!” We had to drink it; we had no choice. As a "student" I had no rights, I was not even treated like a human. I was a prisoner. In fact there were several other teens there with me who had been sent there by the court system as an alternative to Juvenile Hall. Sometimes I couldn’t even pee behind a bush without the rest of the group having to stand guard. People tried to run away, but were hunted down and brought back. At night they took our shoes so that we couldn’t escape into the wilderness, and believe me we would have tried. As a member of Aspen’s Group 211, I saw a thirteen year old girl turn purple and then blue as the staff sat by waiting for her to get herself up off the ground and keep walking. We walked in circles, up and down mountains, in the heat, in the cold and in the dark. We were always lost. For most of the time we carried a pack made of a blue tarp with seat belt material for straps. It was painful and awkward. Towards the end they finally gave us a real backpack, and more food. That was what our parents saw when the came to meet us. At home people watched OJ Simpson’s white bronco racing down a Los Angeles freeway. Meanwhile, we walked, completely unaware of what was happening in the outside world. I got the feeling that a war could have broken out, and they wouldn’t have told us anything. We knew absolutely nothing of the outside world for those two months. My Mom was surprised that I got home and had no knowledge of the OJ incident. We could not even know where we were, or how long we would be there; let alone what was going on at home. If we asked any questions about such things we were punished by having to carry a large stone in our pocket, one for each question. This wouldn't have been so bad if we weren't hiking. But in that circumstance every added ounce of weight can be excruciating. I knew that I was somewhere in Utah, but that was all. There were “no future questions” allowed. We couldn’t even ask when we would get to stop and rest, or be allowed a drink of water, because that concerned the future. The program relies largely on scare tactics and threats to coerce students into behaving. There was the constant threat that if we didn’t do what was expected, we would be forced to stay longer, or even repeat the entire 52 days, but by ourselves without a group. They told us that our parents had no choice in whether or not we stayed in the program longer. Looking back I can see how ridiculous these claims were, but at the time they seemed to be a real threat. No one really stayed longer; we all went home that day in July. We did go home as compliant teenagers, but mostly because we were so terrified of returning. My hiking boots were brand new at the start of the program. However, by the end, the tread on the bottoms had worn down completely. They were basically flat bottom boots. That’s how much hiking we did. In fact, that’s pretty much all we did. We hiked and we hiked, always carrying that heavy backpack. On my high school transcripts there are credits for classes from “Wayne County High School”. I never went to such a school. They are really from my time at Aspen. These “classes” consisted of the completion a series of “curriculum” packets. They were really just confusing worksheets stapled together. The worksheets had obviously been typed out by one of the Aspen staff members. The physical education credits however, I had earned tenfold! There was a wonderful older man by the name of “LaVoy” who I found out later, was supposed to be the teacher. To the best of my knowledge, he had been a local sheep farmer for his whole life, and had never taught in any classroom. He would come and visit rarely, and when he did it was never for an actual academic lesson that I can remember. I do remember that never the less, that his visits were one of the few pleasant things about the whole experience. Actually, the academic instruction was a responsibility delegated to one of the older students and me. We, of course did not understand anything included in the curriculum anymore than the other kids did, yet were the ones expected to “teach”. At the time I had no idea what, or how to teach. They told us it was a reward, because we were always the first ones packed up and crushing the coals from the fire every morning. It seemed like a strange reward to me. Aspen markets itself as a “therapeutic” environment. I find that strange too. There was very little actual “therapy” involved. Once a week, for half and hour or less a “therapist” would come speak with us. This was an occasion we looked forward to because for one, the therapist would bring each of us an apple to eat, and for two, it got us out of having to hike for a couple of hours. Other than that they were of no consequence. These therapy sessions were to brief and far between to be of any help. Mostly in Aspen we just walked and starved. The only other mention of something resembling therapy came each morning when one of the 19 to 21 year old staff members would ask us to use a single word to describe how we felt for that day. We’d go around the circle saying things like “sad”, “mad” or “depressed”. The staff would nod. Then we’d all put on our packs and spend the next eleven hours walking. The “therapy” was a joke. Apparently the “therapist” had periodic phone conversations with my parents. I don’t know what they could have talked about; the therapist knew little of me, or my daily experiences in the program. My main connection to my parents was the letters that we wrote back and forth. The staff had to sensor them all. I never sent or received a sealed envelope. I had to be careful about what I wrote. I tried to tell my parents what was happening, but it was hard. When I got home I found out that they warned our parents that we would exaggerate and not to believe our first hand descriptions of the program. I even heard that my parents had to actually sign over custody of me to the program, and couldn’t have taken me out if they wanted to. I don’t know if that was true, or just another scare tactic used by the Aspen staff, but that’s what they told us. To this day my parents and I rarely (if ever) talk about Utah. About once every few years I casually bring up the subject. They never do. I still have a hard time finding the ability to forgive them in my heart. I hated them like never before during the entire program. I was not happy when they arrived in Utah for the last 2 days of the program, nor did our relationship improve once we got home. It got worse for a while, and to this day I still hold a grudge because of the experience. I know that they had been misinformed, but it is still difficult to forgive them. Before I went to Utah, I was a relatively good kid. I was seventeen years old. Sure, I wasn’t perfect. I had tried smoking cigarettes, tried smoking pot (and hated it) and had sex with two people. When compared to my peers I was fairly normal. Aspen didn’t care; they’ll take anyone whose parents will pay. After I came back from the program I had lost all sense of self worth and self-respect. I decided I didn’t care; it no longer mattered if I continued to resist the bad things in life, because I had already been so severely punished. Within a month of my return I had tried hard-core drugs (such as hallucinogens and Crystal Meth), I spent time in crack houses, with homeless drug addicts, and became a heavy smoker. I also had a lot of casual unprotected sex with different partners, had essentially decided to drop out of high school, and even had an affair with a much older man. Before Aspen I wouldn’t have done any of this. But because of the fact that I’d been punished already whether I was "good" or not, I didn’t care anymore. I’d been through a much more traumatic experience in Utah, drugs and street people couldn’t even compare. Also, after hearing about some of the things the other kids in Aspen had done in their lives I felt like a prude. Actually in comparison to some of them, I still wasn’t very out of control. I learned not to trust my parents under any circumstances. While I had once shared the details of my life with them, I had learned what they were capable of. I knew I had to be careful about letting them in ever again. After Utah, I lied and pretended. I felt like I had to; because I was so afraid that they would send me back if I wasn’t absolutely perfect. For many years after the experience I was tormented by nightmares about Utah and my time there. I’ve been back to the state, and even out into the desert where the program was held, all in an effort to make peace with the memories. Slowly, over time I did recover. I only dream about it ever few months now, and I’m rarely kept up at night by the memories anymore. I think my parents are still paying off the loan they took out to pay for Aspen. I wish they had used the money to help me in school, or something like that instead. Eventually I recovered, and got on a good track. But I feel that (had I not been sent to Aspen) I would have become a healthy productive adult much sooner. In recent years I have heard that the program has been altered slightly. Apparently students now progress through the program at their own rate. It is no longer an issue to wait for everyone in the group to complete a task. Maybe this helps to control the animosity and resentment that existed in my group. We hated each other much of the time. Still, no matter how many changes are made in the program, or how many favorable accounts they post on their web site, I would NEVER recommend this program to anyone. Now despite the “Aspen Experience”, twelve years later I have been able to successfully graduate from college, find a healthy love relationship, a job as a teacher, and even quit smoking. I have become the person my parents had hoped I would be. But, I still have nightmares of Utah. I remember Aspen T-shirts that read, “You’ll go to Hell and Back”. They were half right; I went to hell all right, but it took nearly a decade for me to make it back.

-H.E.69.228.211.236 01:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

• For other survivors' testimonies (and my own) simply type "Aspen Achievement Academy" into google, about two items down you will see a link to an amazing web site called "Heal".

I was there

When I was 13 I spent two months at Aspen. I would not and could not say it saved me, and I resented it while I was there. But the way this program is being described is catagoricaly false. The experiance was difficult and I had to often times work harder than the older groupmembers to do the same ammount of work. But I was never mistreated. The staff for my group where very friendly. I felt legitimatly cared for and still fondly think of them. Further more there were several times where I had been injured or was sick and wa takn care of very well and by the staff. our clothes were changed out and washed weekly, and we certainly had enough to last each week. The accounts I heard from other members of other groups Imet at the graduation group never gave any indication of mistreatment either. Hearing what some of these people write about aspen leads me to beleive that they are former students with a grudge, still upset about having to spend time in the wilderness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.71.77.208 (talk) 00:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspen Achievement Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017030520/http://www.sltrib.com:80/news/ci_7166739 to https://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_7166739

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)