Talk:Asparagus virus 1
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Asparagus virus 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070803182847/http://phene.cpmc.columbia.edu/ICTVdB//00.057.0.01.006.htm to http://phene.cpmc.columbia.edu/ICTVdB/00.057.0.01.006.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The part about Physicochemical and physical properties
[edit]I think that someone should edit this part of the page because it was really really really hard for me to understand and more than half of the words in it, I didn't know what they meant. If I knew what it meant I would try to edit that part myself, but I couldn't even start to comprehent what it meant, so I think that someone else will have to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snow pea lover (talk • contribs) 02:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, @Snow pea lover:, the language is technical but doesn't appear to be misspelt or confusing. It does, however, need proper referencing and suspect a copyvio but the content predates the only identical source I could find by almost a decade. The article doesn't seem to need a copy-edit though. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)