Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tammytrinh (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Malll2, Hannahm715, Dmctagg1.

Asian collectivism

Asian psychology is particularly different from other psychologies in that Asians are more of a collectivist culture … .

While I understand the importance of citing statements such as these (so as to avoid WP ending up as a propaganda tool of sorts), I would have to agree with the editor who wrote that statement. Things like that would be so obvious to people like us living in Asian settings that many of us generally do not see the need to back up such statements with external references. It would be like a Frenchman looking for scientific journals to cite from on something as obvious to the him as their language being written in the Latin alphabet.

Revisions

This appears to be a rather broad subject for discussion so I can see how finding exact examples to support this article may be a challenge. I would suggest finding more specific examples such as authors from the magazines you were mentioning to add more substance to your article. I would also suggest linking the names of some of the important scientists so that wiki users could further investigate the contributing thinkers to this form of psychology if they feel compelled to do so. --Rushdwb (talk) 15:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not represent the whole aspects of the asian culture. This article is a difficult article, I agree because all Asian countries have differences in their psychological standpoints and beliefs. I would encourage this user to put more information about "Asian Psychology" by getting information from popular Asian psychologists and Professors in this field.

good and useful information about the topic (Dallascowboys8aikman (talk) 01:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)) --Jung2daHO (talk) 15:32, 20 Sept. 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asian psychology evaluation

The article has good information but I think a lot of it could be expanded. You could better explain what exactly asian psychology is. You could also improve by expanding what the journals are it's just a short summary but I'm pretty sure you can expand.Jessierock4 (talk) 23:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing This Topic "Asian Psychology"

The article on Asian Psychology has little information, and the page is very bland. It leaves out details on the subject and the summary is very small. Also it has no pictures to help give visual learners a better idea. Sterney21 talk —Preceding undated comment added 22:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC). (Sterney21 (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)) (Sterney21 (talk) (Sterney21 (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)) 22:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your evaluation of the article. There is a great deal of room for improvement in it. One positive is that the article is very neutral, but that is partially due to the fact that there is not much there to begin with. Images definitely could be added. It could use more citations and major points. There is a good deal of work to be done on this page. To those coming after and evaluating this article, in your opinion is this an article worth improving? -SwissPuzzler (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation for Psych 101

The topic is too vague; Asia is extremely physically vast and has a wide variety of cultures. The references are the same as the headings of the articles. The article is confusing because the title is "Asian Psychology", but it uses Asian American references such as the AAPA, which, I'm guessing, stands for the Asian American Psychology Association. There needs to be links within the article to help the reader research terms. A map of Asia would be greatly helpful for understanding better the area where this psychology comes from. Sanwish (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I too think that this article is very vague, It would be easier to focus on one or two aspects of Asian Psychology instead of trying to focus on it all.(User talk:Ml174339) 02:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asian psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324120411/http://ebooks.iaccp.org/xian/PDFs/2_1Adair.pdf to http://ebooks.iaccp.org/xian/PDFs/2_1Adair.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at St. Charles Community College supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]