Talk:Asian Welsh people

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

language use

it seems editors here are using 'ancestry', 'heritage' and 'descent' in the introduction more or less interchangeably.

I initially used 'heritage' in the article description for consistency with the language used in the first part of the introduction, however this description was (rightfully) shortened, and 'heritage' switched to 'descent'. the idea communicated remains similar enough, but the words do not have the exact same meanings so I'm wondering what would be the best way forward here. I'm wondering about this also in terms of not using the language used in source material - which for the introduction, the census stats only use ethnic group - 'ethnicity' as it's described there being a broad definition, broader than 'heritage', 'ancestry', and 'descent', and all having slightly to somewhat different definitions.

In my opinion, to change language in the article to reflect source material language should be considered, even if just from the fact that the definitions they're using that census respondents are choosing within are broader than the definitions that come with the language used in this article, so the article ends up being not fully representative/communicative(?) of the source material. however, the census definition of ethnicity as well as some of the categories has overlap with race. which complicates things further. not to mention the ongoing issues with the census categories altogether (like with lacking Black Welsh and Asian Welsh, and classifying Roma as white, for example. but I digress), which makes me hesitant to follow along with the census category language used without question too. so I think that all should be considered also.

thoughts please? Ratxbogbody (talk) 11:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]