Talk:Asia Regional Organic Standard

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Drafted article (basics, what I learned so far)

Hi Huggi, just to ask are you planning to continue work on Draft:Asia Regional Organic Standards? If not I'm willing to take it on: Noyster (talk), 11:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User talk:Noyster go ahead!

My last message to someone at IFOAM was: "I've got your details from the following document, page 6: http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/an765e/an765e00.pdf

At the end there is a reference to www.goma-organic.org. The website is not available, is there any particular reason for that?"

Actually I don't wanna waste my time with "dead" projects like this. But would be interesting if you find more details, at least goma-organic.org works now again, but it does not look like this operator is related to a serious IFOAM/FAO project. I'm watching the page, so I will see how it goes for you! --huggi - never stop exploring (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noyster "Finished article" - seriously? The referenced website does not work, ends up on a spam site --huggi - never stop exploring (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I thought you said it was "working now again"? - OK, out it goes. Do you have any further comments?: Noyster (talk), 11:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

added some stuff to the see also section, maybe you could add more from other existing standard articles, but the rest looks good to me. The original reason why I came across this was that the Singaporean government was recommending AROS, so I started reading. That was originally from here: Organic_certification#Singapore

List_of_countries_with_organic_agriculture_regulation do you know which countries implemented it?
List of food labeling regulations maybe this is also something for see also or you could use it in the intro part.

Rest looks good, thanks for editing :) --huggi - never stop exploring (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asia Regional Organic Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]