Talk:Ashur-dan III/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 13:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey I'll review this one as well, probably tomorrow. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nevermind! Review was straightforward and similar to Shalmaneser IV, pass. --Cerebellum (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]- Prose: Article is well written and complies with the MOS. I did some light copy editing, feel free to revert if you disagree with the changes.
- References: Article is thoroughly referenced to high-quality modern sources.
- Coverage: Yes, article seems to cover what is known about this king's reign in an appropriate level of detail, you didn't add extra background info just to pad the article length.
- Neutral: Yes.
- Stable: Yes.
- Illustrated: No, I don't think illustrations are necessary. --Cerebellum (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)