Talk:Ashley George Old
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ashley George Old article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Portrait of "Dusty" Rhodes
[edit]- Being a professional artist, I know more than well what can, and what cannot be done in 3 minutes. The WP:CAPTION under the image was a classic WP:REDFLAG for me, therefore I looked closely at the scan of the original artwork in question. And ... this is what I saw. The note about the quote-unquote: "3 minute sketch", written with a different colour pen, has been added by an undisclosed hand at a different time, because the author's real signature, done with a watercolour brush is right above it, easy to compare. It is written in a completely different style of handwriting. By the way, writing notes on other people artwork usually decreases the value of the original dramatically. That's why only an idiot would ever deface the original artwork in such a way. In the end, it is a Wikipedia issue of the complete absence of basic WP:VERIFIABILITY of the claim made by an online user. Poeticbent talk 14:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Everything you have said is YOUR OPINION and hence original research, not allowed by Wiki. And as you say, why would anybody deface a piece of original art? Tomintoul (talk) 08:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- No. The WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH is your preposterous personal assumption that "the earth is flat", because the forged little note under the watercolour says so. BTW, people deface artworks all the time, and they do so usually out of ignorance. Poeticbent talk 13:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Everything you have said is YOUR OPINION and hence original research, not allowed by Wiki. And as you say, why would anybody deface a piece of original art? Tomintoul (talk) 08:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- The full debate on this topic is here: Talk:Prisoner of war Tomintoul (talk) 21:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ashley George Old. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/pictures/gid/slv-pic-aaa38466 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130621042311/http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/pictures/gid/slv-pic-aaa37760 to http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/pictures/gid/slv-pic-aaa37760
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- C-Class Bedfordshire articles
- Low-importance Bedfordshire articles