Jump to content

Talk:Ascension (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • No dab links, ELs look good, and the screenshot seems suitable
  • Add critical reaction to lead
  • Identify who Alex Krycek is (like you did with Mulder). Likewise for X and any other pertinent characters you feel further explanation is needed
  • "Mulder realizes that Barry is heading to a ski resort at Skyland Mountain, the location of his original abduction". Sorry, who's abduction? Mulder or Barry's? (Haven't watched the series)
  • Perhaps mention that Krycek secretly tried to kill Mulder (i.e. Mulder is unaware Krycek is behind the tram accident-or whatever it was). Don't think it clearly indicates that in its original state
  • Indicate Carter is series creator
  • "Chris Carter declared both the censors and the producers were reluctant on showing Scully in the trunk, but he "fought for that image" as he considered it conveyed the sense of danger to the character. " Not sure "declared" is the right word to use here; maybe change to "Chris Carter commented that both the censors and the producers were reluctant to show Scully in the trunk..."
  • Add guest stars to production section (all info in lead should be in body of article)
  • The lead could also mention recap a little more of the production section, such as Anderson's pregnancy
  • "In a retrospective of the second season..." Shouldn't it be "In retrospect of the second season..."? Or am I just reading it wrong?
  • Add space between p./pp. and number

Otherwise, it looks good. As always, I'll put this review on hold for seven days while the above comments get addressed/replied to. Please reply here when you have finished. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 00:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for another review, I appreciate it. I think I've addressed your concerns but let me know if I've missed anything. GRAPPLE X 01:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, author for ref 12? Ruby 2010/2013 02:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Took a bit of digging but I got it. GRAPPLE X 02:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Article looks good. Pass for GA. Nice work! Ruby 2010/2013 02:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! GRAPPLE X 02:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]